Asymmetric Threaded Joint for Dissimilar Material Shear Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for joining dissimilar strength structural materials result in inefficient configurations with overly large thread engagement, leading to increased parasitic weight and volume, and fail to provide a controlled release in adverse environments, especially in insensitive munitions and shock mitigation applications.

Innovation Solution

The development of a biased equivalent strength threaded joint with unequal bilateral thread distribution, where the thread thickness and pitch are tailored to provide equivalent shear strength to both materials, allowing for a non-permanent joint with minimal increase in thread length and incorporating secondary vent paths for controlled release.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If standard thread engagement is used to join dissimilar strength structural materials, then the weaker material receives sufficient shear area, but the stronger material becomes overly strong with increased parasitic weight and volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshear strength of weaker materialVSAvoidparasitic weight of stronger material
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating asymmetric thread geometry where the thread thicknesses in the first and second structural members are intentionally made unequal. The thread thickness in the weaker material is increased to provide adequate shear area, while the thread thickness in the stronger material is reduced to minimize parasitic weight. This localized differentiation of thread dimensions allows each material to contribute optimally to the joint strength without unnecessary weight penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs asymmetry by deviating from conventional symmetric thread designs where both mating parts have equal thread thicknesses. Instead, the patent specifies that the thread thickness in the first structural member differs from the thread thickness in the second structural member. This asymmetric configuration is mathematically optimized based on the relative strengths of the two materials, enabling the weaker material to receive enhanced shear support while the stronger material maintains minimal necessary thickness, thereby resolving the weight-strength contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If standard thread engagement is used, then joint strength is achieved, but thread length increases leading to excessive parasitic volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidparasitic volume of thread engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the thread engagement length optimization in specific regions. By making thread thicknesses unequal, the design allows the weaker material to have thicker threads over a shorter engagement length, while the stronger material has thinner threads that can be extended or reduced as needed. This localized optimization of thread dimensions enables adequate shear area without proportionally increasing the overall thread engagement length and associated parasitic volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The asymmetric thread thickness distribution enables more efficient use of thread engagement length. The weaker material's thicker threads provide higher shear capacity per unit length, reducing the required engagement length. The stronger material's thinner threads contribute less to shear capacity but occupy less volume per unit length. This asymmetric arrangement allows the joint to achieve required strength with minimized total thread engagement volume, resolving the strength-volume contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Strength

If permanent threaded joint is used, then strength is maintained, but controlled release in adverse environments cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidcontrolled release capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by enabling the threaded joint to transition from a permanent state to a releasable state based on environmental conditions. The asymmetric thread geometry, with the weaker material having thicker threads, creates a predetermined failure mode where the weaker material's threads can be designed to fail at specific stress thresholds or environmental conditions (such as temperature, pressure, or shock). This dynamic characteristic allows the joint to maintain strength during normal operation while providing controlled release capabilities in adverse environments, resolving the strength-adaptability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11703075B1Biased equivalent strength threaded joint for dissimilar strength structural materials
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US11703075B1 patent drawing
  • US11703075B1 patent drawing
  • US11703075B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to first and second structural members that are threadingly-engaged with each other. The first and second structural members are dissimilar strength materials. Each structural member configured with a plurality of threads for the threading engagement. The thread thickness of each thread in the plurality of threads for the first structural member is not equal to the thread thickness of each thread in the plurality of threads for the second structural member.