Asymmetrical Heart Valve Frame with Indentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heart valve prostheses with expandable tubular frames and mesh structures are not fully satisfactory due to risks of interfering with the aortic valve operation, migration, and obstruction of the ventricular ejection path, and are difficult to place with a shape that is not perfectly adapted to the implantation site, especially in elderly patients.

Innovation Solution

The prosthesis features an asymmetrical ventricular portion with a large indentation and anchoring spikes on both the atrial and ventricular portions, allowing for secure anchoring to the valve annulus without hindering the aortic valve, and a spherical or ovoid shape for the ventricular portion to reduce migration risks and facilitate easy placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a complete tubular frame with mesh structure is used, then structural strength and support are improved, but the risk of interfering with aortic valve operation and obstructing ventricular ejection path increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidinterference with aortic valve
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes a sector of the mesh structure from the ventricular portion to create an indentation. This extraction eliminates the harmful interaction with the aortic valve and ventricular ejection path while preserving the structural integrity of the remaining frame through strategic placement of anchoring spikes and optimized geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry by creating a large indentation on one side of the ventricular portion while maintaining a complete structure on the opposite side. This asymmetric design allows the prosthesis to avoid interfering with the aortic valve on the indented side while maintaining adequate support where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the mesh structure is reduced to avoid aortic valve interference, then harmful factors are reduced, but the anchoring stability and resistance to migration worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference with aortic valveVSAvoidanchoring stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the anchoring function from the continuous mesh structure by introducing discrete anchoring spikes at critical locations. These spikes are strategically positioned to provide sufficient anchoring stability while the intervening mesh-free zone prevents interference with the aortic valve and ventricular ejection path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The anchoring spikes are designed to engage with the annular portion and ventricular wall during the deployment process, establishing secure anchoring before the prosthesis is fully expanded. This preliminary anchoring action ensures stability is achieved even with reduced mesh structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If a symmetrical tubular frame is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but the adaptation to the anatomical implantation site and reduction of migration risk worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidanatomical adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry by creating a large indentation on one side of the ventricular portion while maintaining a complete structure on the opposite side. This asymmetric design allows the prosthesis to avoid interfering with the aortic valve on the indented side while maintaining adequate support where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Reliability

If anchoring spikes are added to ensure complete anchoring, then migration risk is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchoring stabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the anchoring function from the continuous mesh structure by introducing discrete anchoring spikes at critical locations. These spikes are strategically positioned to provide sufficient anchoring stability while the intervening mesh-free zone prevents interference with the aortic valve and ventricular ejection path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The prosthesis effectively prevents interference with the aortic valve operation, reduces migration and obstruction risks, and is easier to place with a shape well-suited to the anatomical site, ensuring secure locking and reduced paravalvular leakage.

Implementation Method 1

The frame may be self-expandable (in particular being made from a shape memory material) or made from an expandable material using a balloon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShape memory effect: Shape Memory Alloy

Data Source

PatentUS10925725B2Prosthetic mitral or tricuspid heart valve
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 VALMY HLDG
  • US10925725B2 patent drawing
  • US10925725B2 patent drawing
  • US10925725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This prosthesis (1), comprises an expandable tubular frame (2) with a mesh structure and a prosthetic valve (3) mounted on this frame;the ventricular portion (2v) of the frame (2) has a large indentation (6) on one side, extending lengthwise from the end of this ventricular portion (2v) that is opposite said annular portion (2i) to the part of this ventricular portion (2v) close to the annular portion (2i), this indentation (6) extending over a sector of the circumference of the prosthesis (1) of about 90 to 140°;said atrial portion (2a) flares toward the outside of the prosthesis, from said annular portion (2i) toward the end of this atrial portion opposite this annular portion, and comprises anchoring spikes (5a) on the side of said annular portion (2i); andsaid ventricular portion (2v) has a substantially spherical or ovoid shape and comprises anchoring spikes (5v) on the side of said annular portion (2i).