Asymmetrical Multifocal Ocular Implants for Continuous Depth of Field

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multifocal ocular implants often result in discontinuous depth of field between intermediate and near vision when used binocularly, leading to suppressive effects and reduced visual acuity due to significant differences in addition between the two eyes' peaks.

Innovation Solution

A pair of multifocal ocular implants with asymmetrical TFMTF curves, where one implant has a higher TFMTF value in intermediate vision and the other in near vision, ensuring continuous depth of field by combining 'complementary' TFMTF profiles with overlapping values greater than 0.15, and slopes that facilitate smooth transition between vision ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional multifocal ocular implants with symmetrical TFMTF curves are used in both eyes, then distance vision and near vision can be addressed, but discontinuous depth of field occurs between intermediate and near vision due to significant differences in addition between the two eyes' peaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual acuity continuityVSAvoidbinocular vision comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing the first implant with a TFMTF curve where the rising edge of the asymmetrical peak has a greater mean slope than the falling edge, while the second implant has the opposite configuration. This asymmetrical design allows the peaks to be shifted by greater additions (e.g., 2.00D or 2.50D) without creating discontinuities, thereby maintaining visual acuity continuity and binocular vision comfort across intermediate and near vision ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating complementary TFMTF curves where each implant is optimized for specific vision ranges. The first implant has higher TFMTF values in intermediate vision while the second implant has higher TFMTF values in near vision. This localized optimization ensures that each eye contributes optimally to specific depth ranges, achieving continuous depth of field from intermediate to near vision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If implants with larger difference in addition between eyes are used, then greater flexibility in addressing presbyopia is achieved, but suppressive effects increase and visual acuity decreases due to discontinuous depth of field

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresbyopia correction flexibilityVSAvoidvisual acuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetrical TFMTF curve design enables greater flexibility in presbyopia correction by allowing larger differences in addition between the two implants (e.g., 2.00D or 2.50D shift). The complementary asymmetrical configurations ensure that even with these larger differences, the depth of field remains continuous and visual acuity is maintained above 5/10, eliminating the suppressive effects that would normally occur with such large additions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of manufacture

If symmetrical TFMTF curves are used in both eyes, then manufacturing and prescription are simplified, but the depth of field is discontinuous between intermediate and near vision ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant prescription simplicityVSAvoiddepth of field continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by introducing asymmetry in the TFMTF curves while maintaining manufacturing feasibility. The asymmetrical peaks are designed with specific slope characteristics (rising edge vs. falling edge) that can be incorporated into standard implant manufacturing processes. This approach maintains depth of field continuity between intermediate and near vision without requiring overly complex custom manufacturing, as the asymmetry is built into the optical design rather than requiring post-manufacturing adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The local quality principle allows different regions of the TFMTF curve to be optimized independently. The first implant is optimized with higher TFMTF values in the intermediate vision range, while the second implant is optimized for near vision. This localized optimization creates continuous depth of field while keeping each individual implant design relatively simple and manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a visual acuity greater than 5/10 across the intermediate to near vision range, reducing the bothersome effect of halos and enhancing binocular vision continuity, while tolerating greater differences between the apices of the peaks.

Implementation Method 1

implants with multifocal optical surfaces (refractive or preferably diffractive)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

implants with multifocal optical surfaces (refractive or preferably diffractive)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS11266494B2Assembly consisting of a pair of multifocal ocular implants
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 CRISTALENS IND SAS
  • US11266494B2 patent drawing
  • US11266494B2 patent drawing
  • US11266494B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly comprising a pair of multifocal ocular implants, wherein each implant has a TFMTF curve, for a pupil of diameter less than or equal to 4 mm, preferably less than 3 mm, having a peak corresponding to the distance vision of the wearer, as well as an asymmetrical peak which spreads between intermediate vision and near vision without discontinuity;for a first implant, the TFMTF value is greater in intermediate vision than that of near vision;for the second implant, the TFMTF value is greater in near vision than that of intermediate vision;the rising edge of the asymmetrical peak of the first implant has, as an absolute value, a mean slope greater than that of its falling edge, whereas the rising edge of the asymmetrical peak of the second implant has, as an absolute value, a mean slope less than that of its falling edge.