Asymmetrical Power Distribution for Maglev Train Energy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional magnetic levitation train systems face inefficiencies in power distribution due to constant power supply across all track segments regardless of speed profiles, leading to increased power consumption during acceleration and deceleration phases, and high installation and maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

The system employs an asymmetrical power distribution with distinct zones for acceleration, cruise, and deceleration, where winding segments are strategically placed and connected to optimize power usage, with consecutive segments in acceleration and deceleration zones and spaced segments in the cruise zone to minimize power consumption, and includes onboard batteries and low-cost winding segments for backup power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If constant power is supplied to all track segments, then the train can maintain operation throughout the track, but power consumption increases and installation costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain operation continuityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The track is divided into multiple segments with winding segments and empty spaces alternately arranged. Power is supplied only to winding segments, allowing the train to coast through empty space segments, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining operational capability throughout the track.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The train experiences periodic acceleration and coasting phases as it passes through alternating winding and empty segments. This periodic power application pattern reduces average power consumption compared to continuous power supply, while still achieving the required speed profile and operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional symmetrical power distribution is used, then installation is simplified, but power consumption increases during acceleration and deceleration phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidpower consumption during acceleration/deceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different track segments have different properties: winding segments provide magnetic propulsion while empty segments allow coasting. This local differentiation optimizes power consumption by applying power only where needed (during acceleration and deceleration zones) rather than uniformly across the entire track.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If winding segments are installed along the complete track, then continuous propulsion is available, but installation and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous propulsion availabilityVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Empty segments are extracted from the continuous winding segment configuration. These removed segments eliminate unnecessary power supply infrastructure and reduce installation/maintenance costs while the remaining winding segments provide sufficient propulsion when needed, maintaining operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If power is supplied to the entire track, then the train can operate at any position, but the system becomes inefficient for long tracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain operation flexibilityVSAvoidpower consumption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The track is segmented into powered and unpowered sections, allowing the train to operate flexibly across the entire track by alternating between acceleration in winding segments and coasting in empty segments, thereby maintaining adaptability while improving energy efficiency for long tracks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces power consumption and installation costs by optimizing power distribution based on speed profiles, maintaining efficient operation and allowing for reduced maintenance, while ensuring minimal speed drops and enabling the train to reach the next station in case of failures.

Implementation Method 1

comprising a plurality of consecutive winding segments all along this section of the track, being the winding segments electrically connected to each other and to a current supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

magnetic levitation train system was conceived, in which repelling magnetic forces are applied to levitate the trains. Said forces are produced by magnets placed on the train which interact with a passive conducting track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic repulsion: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP3798043B1Magnetic levitation train system with an asymmetrical power distribution
Publication Date: 2023.07.12 HYPERLOOP TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES
  • EP3798043B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3798043B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3798043B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A magnetic levitation train system with an asymmetrical power distribution, comprising a train which is moved through a track that is at least partly located within an airless tube, the track having at least two stations, comprising each section of the track between two correlative stations the following zones: - an acceleration zone located at the beginning of the section, comprising a plurality of consecutive winding segments electrically connected to each other and to a current supply, - a deceleration zone, comprising a plurality of consecutive winding segments electrically connected to each other and to a current supply, and - a cruise zone in which the train is moved on a cruise speed, located between the acceleration zone and the deceleration zone, comprising a plurality of winding segments electrically connected to a current supply, and comprising a plurality of empty spaces between some of the winding segments.