Asymmetrical Ramps for Synchronization Device Servo Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing synchronization devices face challenges in producing optimized servo forces for gear shifting, leading to increased wear and susceptibility to axial tolerances, with complex structures and prolonged synchronization processes.

Innovation Solution

The use of asymmetrical ramps for servo force production during upshifting and downshifting, allowing for differential axial servo forces based on gear requirements, which simplifies the construction and reduces wear by optimizing shifting forces and times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blocking pieces are spaced apart circumferentially in a uniform manner to produce servo force, then synchronization function is achieved, but structure becomes complex and wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization functionVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the servo force production function from the blocking pieces and transfers it to the ramps. The blocking pieces are reduced to only their blocking function, while the ramps independently handle servo force generation through their angular geometry, simplifying the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The synchronization device is segmented into distinct functional elements: blocking pieces for axial blocking only, and ramps for servo force production only. This functional segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If blocking pieces are supported by ramps as force transfer surfaces, then servo force is produced, but axial tolerances susceptibility increases and wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservo force productionVSAvoidaxial tolerances susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The force transfer function is extracted from the blocking pieces and assigned to the ramps. The ramps are designed with specific angular geometry that provides inherent tolerance compensation, reducing susceptibility to axial tolerances while maintaining effective servo force production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If blocking faces are designed wide to accommodate angular positions, then servo force transfer is improved, but sliding transfer phase lengthens and force expenditure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservo force transferVSAvoidsliding transfer phase
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The ramps are designed with optimized local geometry at the force transfer surfaces, using specific angular angles that maximize force transfer efficiency within a compact axial space. This eliminates the need for wide blocking faces while maintaining effective servo force transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The angular parameters of the ramps are specifically optimized to achieve effective servo force transfer over a shortened axial distance. By changing the geometric parameters of the ramps, the sliding transfer phase is reduced without compromising force transfer reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If asymmetrical ramps are used for upshifting and downshifting, then shifting forces are optimized, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshifting force optimizationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Asymmetrical ramps are implemented with different angular geometries optimized for upshifting and downshifting operations. The first ramps have angles optimized for one direction while the second ramps have angles optimized for the opposite direction, allowing force optimization without requiring complex multi-component systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces axial shifting force, shortens synchronization time, and minimizes wear by providing a uniform force characteristic during shifting, enhancing user experience and reducing production costs.

Implementation Method 1

ramps for producing a servo force axial with respect to the shaft are provided on at least one component part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRamp force transformation: Wedge

Implementation Method 2

the blocking synchronizer ring for its part exerting on the change wheel a circumferential force or torque by means of friction in order to brake or accelerate the change wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9027426B2Synchronization device
Publication Date: 2015.05.12 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9027426B2 patent drawing
  • US9027426B2 patent drawing
  • US9027426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A synchronization device for a transmission includes a sliding sleeve, a blocking synchronizer ring and a change wheel. In a force flow region between the blocking synchronizer ring and the change wheel, ramps for producing a servo force axial with respect to the shaft are provided on at least one component part.