Asymmetrical Rotor Flow Barriers for Low Torque Ripple Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Synchronous reluctance electrical machines with permanent magnets face issues of torque ripples and counter-electromotive force harmonics, leading to rotor vibrations and high losses, which are exacerbated by the need for small air gaps that increase costs and precision requirements.

Innovation Solution

A rotor design with a lamellar pack comprising sheets with axial recesses and magnetic flow generators, featuring asymmetrical flow barriers that reduce torque ripple and counter-electromotive force harmonics, allowing for a larger air gap and increased working tolerances, comprising eight magnetic poles with three flow barriers each, and specific opening angles to optimize magnetic flux distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the air gap between rotor and stator is reduced to improve electrical machine performance, then efficiency and performance are improved, but manufacturing precision requirements and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical machine performanceVSAvoidair gap precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing flow barriers with different configurations in alternating poles. Specifically, in poles of the same magnetic polarity, adjacent flow barriers have different opening angles relative to the radial direction, creating an asymmetric magnetic flux distribution that reduces torque ripples and allows for larger air gaps without sacrificing performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If the air gap between rotor and stator is increased to reduce manufacturing costs and tolerances, then working tolerances and costs are improved, but electrical machine performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking tolerancesVSAvoidelectrical machine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the flow barriers, specifically the opening angles, to optimize magnetic flux distribution. By adjusting these parameters, the invention maintains strong magnetic coupling across the air gap even when the air gap itself is enlarged, thereby preserving performance while improving manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional rotor design is used, then结构简单 is maintained, but torque ripple and counter-electromotive force harmonics increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor structureVSAvoidtorque ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the flow barrier design where alternating poles have flow barriers with different opening angles. This asymmetric configuration modifies the magnetic flux distribution in a controlled manner, effectively reducing torque ripples and counter-electromotive force harmonics while maintaining reasonable structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor is segmented into multiple poles with alternating flow barrier configurations. Each pole contains multiple flow barriers with specific opening angles, creating a segmented approach to flux control that reduces harmful harmonics through distributed magnetic field modification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The rotor design enhances efficiency and performance by minimizing torque ripple and counter-electromotive force harmonics, enabling a larger air gap that reduces costs and increases working tolerances, while maintaining high performance.

Implementation Method 1

specific opening angles to optimize magnetic flux distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux distribution: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The rotor is rotated by reluctance torque and magnet torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReluctance torque: Magnetic Reluctance

Implementation Method 3

The rotor is rotated by reluctance torque and magnet torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnet torque: Magnetism

Implementation Method 4

electric coils adapted to generate a magnetic field which allows rotating the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic interaction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3804091B1Rotor for an electrical machine and electrical machine comprising said rotor
Publication Date: 2023.11.29 MAVEL EDT SPA
  • EP3804091B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3804091B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3804091B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A rotor (1) for electrical machine is described, comprising a rotation shaft; a lamellar pack comprising a plurality of sheets (3), comprising a number (Pp) of pairs of primary magnetic poles (13) and secondary magnetic poles (14), each of the primary magnetic poles (13) and secondary magnetic poles (14) comprising an internal flow barrier (11), an intermediate flow barrier (10), and an external flow barrier (9).