Asymmetrical Scanning Drive Circuits for Display Panel Center Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional display panels with integrally formed scanning signal line drive circuits are not compatible with non-integral-type display panels, and they are prone to leakage and wiring breaks, which reduces yield.

Innovation Solution

The display panel features asymmetrical scanning signal line drive circuits with different sizes and configurations on both sides, including varying transistor sizes, wiring widths, and spacings, to match the center position of a non-integral-type display panel and reduce wiring issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If scanning signal line drive circuits are integrally formed on both sides of the display region with the same configuration, then the display panel achieves symmetry and manufacturing simplicity, but the center position of the display region does not match that of non-integral-type display panels, causing incompatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcompatibility with non-integral-type display panels
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by configuring the first and second scanning signal line drive circuits with different numbers of stages. Specifically, when the number of scanning signal lines is divisible by 4, the first drive circuit has N/4 stages and the second has N/4-1 stages. This asymmetric configuration shifts the display region center to match non-integral-type panels while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through systematic design rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by making different portions of the drive circuits have different characteristics. The first scanning signal line drive circuit uses N/4 stages while the second uses N/4-1 stages, creating localized differences in circuit configuration. This allows the overall system to achieve compatibility with non-integral panels while maintaining systematic manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If scanning signal line drive circuits are integrally formed on the display panel, then the display device size is reduced, but leakage between wiring lines and breaks in wiring lines occur more frequently, reducing yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay device sizeVSAvoidwiring line integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric configuration of drive circuits with different stage numbers (N/4 vs N/4-1) creates an optimized wiring layout that reduces the total length and complexity of interconnections. This asymmetric design distributes wiring stress more evenly and reduces the probability of leakage and breaks while maintaining the compact integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the drive circuits by using different numbers of stages in the first and second circuits. This parameter variation optimizes the wiring configuration, reducing wiring density in critical areas and thereby improving reliability against leakage and breaks while maintaining compact size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If asymmetrical scanning signal line drive circuits with different sizes are used, then compatibility with non-integral-type display panels is achieved and wiring issues are reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with non-integral-type display panelsVSAvoidcircuit configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry in a controlled and systematic way, using different stage numbers (N/4 vs N/4-1) based on clear mathematical rules. This systematic asymmetry achieves compatibility with non-integral panels while maintaining design regularity, thereby limiting the increase in complexity to only what is necessary for compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The local differentiation in circuit stages is applied only where necessary to achieve center position alignment, rather than throughout the entire device. This localized asymmetry minimizes the overall complexity increase while achieving the compatibility goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9208741B2Display panel
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 SHARP KK
  • US9208741B2 patent drawing
  • US9208741B2 patent drawing
  • US9208741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

On a display panel 10, a first scanning signal line drive circuit 12 is formed along a side of a display region 11 and a second scanning signal line drive circuit 13 is formed along the opposite side by the same process as pixel circuits. The size of a transistor included, the width of a wiring line, or the like, differs between the first and second scanning signal line drive circuits 12 and 13, and the two scanning signal line drive circuits have different sizes in a lateral direction. By this, the center of the display region matches that of a non-integral-type display panel, ensuring compatibility with the non-integral-type display panel. Moreover, by suitably determining the widths of or spacings between wiring lines included in the two scanning signal line drive circuits, leakage between the wiring lines and breaks in the wiring lines are reduced, improving yield of display panels.