Asynchronous Co-Watching Reaction Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current content distribution systems only allow for synchronous consumption of content, where users cannot view reactions from previous viewers at a later time, lacking the ability to asynchronously consume content alongside initial users' reactions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that record and synchronize user reactions during content consumption, allowing subsequent users to view these reactions if they meet a minimum engagement level, with options to configure which reactions and on which devices to display, using machine learning and AI for facial and audio analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the system records all user reactions during content consumption, then the quantity of reaction data is maximized, but the quality of useful information decreases due to inclusion of minimal or unengaging reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of reaction dataVSAvoidquality of useful information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of reaction filtering by introducing an engagement threshold that dynamically determines which reactions are recorded and shared. Reactions are analyzed based on engagement parameters (duration, intensity, type) and only those exceeding the threshold are included in the asynchronous viewing experience, thereby improving information quality while maintaining relevant quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separates engaging reactions from the total set of reactions by applying filtering criteria. Minimal or unengaging reactions are taken out of the shared data stream, while only reactions meeting the engagement threshold are extracted for asynchronous delivery, thus improving the quality of information shared with subsequent viewers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides reactions on multiple devices, then the versatility of viewing options is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewing optionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements multi-functionality by enabling reactions to be delivered across multiple device types (mobile devices, tablets, computers, televisions) through a unified asynchronous viewing platform. The same reaction data infrastructure serves multiple viewing contexts and device formats, increasing versatility without requiring separate complex systems for each device type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary asynchronous viewing platform that mediates between the original synchronous viewing event and the subsequent viewing experience. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of multi-device delivery, abstracting the technical details while providing universal access to reactions across different devices and viewing scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the system uses machine learning and AI for reaction analysis, then the precision of engagement detection is improved, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement detection precisionVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using machine learning and AI for reaction analysis only when necessary - specifically when determining whether reactions meet the engagement threshold for asynchronous sharing. The computational resources are deployed selectively to analyze reactions that could potentially be shared, rather than continuously processing all reactions, thus improving detection precision for relevant reactions while managing computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10820060B1Asynchronous co-watching
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 DISCORD INC
  • US10820060B1 patent drawing
  • US10820060B1 patent drawing
  • US10820060B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed computer-implemented method may include determining that a subsequent user is consuming content that was consumed previously by an initial user. The computer may access various reactions by the initial user to the content that were recorded and synchronized as the initial user consumed the content. The computer may further determine that at least some of the reactions by the initial user have an engagement level above a predetermined threshold, and then provide the reactions with engagement levels above the predetermined threshold for presentation to the subsequent user synchronously with the content as the content is consumed by the subsequent user. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.