Asynchronous Unstructured Data Processing for Real-Time Decisioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional automated decisioning systems for unstructured data face inefficiencies due to sequential processing, leading to delays, timeouts, and reduced flexibility, especially when handling exceptions and varying data formats, which hinder real-time decisioning capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An automated adjudication architecture that separates the data conversion and decisioning processes into asynchronous components, allowing for modular, parallel execution through a conversion component that extracts structured data segments and a decisioning component that processes these segments independently, with interface components managing data transfer without interrupting the workflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If sequential two-step processing is used for unstructured data, then processing simplicity is maintained, but processing speed and real-time decisioning capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sequential two-step processing into multiple parallel processing streams, where data extraction and decisioning operations are divided into independent tasks that can execute concurrently. This segmentation enables the system to process unstructured data through multiple pathways simultaneously, dramatically improving processing speed while maintaining manageable complexity through modular task design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential one-dimensional processing to parallel multi-dimensional processing by introducing temporal and spatial dimensions to the processing architecture. Multiple extraction and decisioning components operate in parallel across different processing lanes, transforming the single-file sequential workflow into a multi-dimensional concurrent processing system that achieves real-time decisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If data extraction and decisioning are tightly coupled, then data flow control is simplified, but system flexibility and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidcomponent coupling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the tightly coupled extraction-decisioning system into loosely coupled modular components. Each extraction component and decisioning component is separated into independent units with well-defined interfaces, allowing individual components to be modified, updated, or replaced without affecting the entire system. This modular segmentation enables flexible adaptation to different data formats and decisioning requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary mechanisms such as message queues and event buffers between extraction and decisioning components. These intermediaries decouple the direct dependency between components, allowing extraction to proceed independently and decisioning to consume data at its own pace. This intermediary layer provides the flexibility needed to handle varying data formats and exception scenarios while maintaining system coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If processing delays occur at data extraction, then data accuracy may be improved through thorough extraction, but decisioning component idle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata extraction accuracyVSAvoiddecisioning component idle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having multiple decisioning components prepared and ready to process data before extraction is complete. While one extraction component is processing complex unstructured data to ensure accuracy, other decisioning components remain in standby or process previously extracted data, eliminating idle time and ensuring continuous operation without compromising extraction thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action through parallel processing streams and load balancing mechanisms. When extraction delays occur in one stream, other streams continue processing, and decisioning components dynamically shift workload to maintain continuous operation. This ensures that no decisioning component remains idle while extraction accuracy is preserved through dedicated extraction resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Adaptability or versatility

If processing is limited to particular data formats, then processing efficiency is improved, but system versatility and exception handling capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata format flexibilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing extraction and decisioning components with multi-functional capabilities that can handle multiple data formats and exception scenarios. The system incorporates universal data validation and normalization layers that adapt to different input formats while maintaining consistent processing efficiency. This universal design enables the system to process diverse unstructured data including images, PDFs, and text documents without sacrificing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting processing parameters based on detected data formats and characteristics. When unusual data formats or exception scenarios are detected, the system automatically modifies extraction and decisioning parameters to optimize handling of the specific data type. This parameter adaptation maintains processing efficiency across varying data formats while enhancing system versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260072935A1Asynchronous processing system for unstructured data
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 OPTUM INC
  • US20260072935A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072935A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072935A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide an automated asynchronous decisioning process that improves the functionality of a computer in various aspects. The process may comprise receiving, an input data object that comprising a set of unstructured data elements and converting the input data object to a structured data object by (i) extracting, using an optical character recognition model, a set of input features from the input data object, (ii) generating, using a structuring ruleset, a structured data element based on the set of input features, and (iii) storing the structured data element within a polling queue and in association with the request identifier. The process may comprise receiving, from a polling component, a polling request and responsive to receiving the polling request, providing, to the polling component, at least one of the request identifier, the structured data element, or a conversion status for the structured data object.