AT-Cut Crystal Element Geometry for Higher Crystal Impedance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing piezoelectric devices with AT-cut crystal elements have limitations in impedance improvement due to the etching process, which reduces the planar area and increases unnecessary vibrations, necessitating a more effective manufacturing method and design for enhanced crystal impedance (CI).

Innovation Solution

A piezoelectric device with an AT-cut crystal element featuring a quadrangular planar shape and side surfaces intersecting with the Z′-axis, including three specifically angled surfaces (first, second, and third surfaces) and approximately right-angled corner portions, secured with conductive adhesive, utilizing a photolithography and wet etching technique to optimize crystal impedance by reducing unnecessary vibrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a long-period etching process is used to form the crystal element surfaces, then the first to third surfaces with specific angles can be achieved, but the planar area of the crystal element is reduced due to excessive etching at corner portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface angle precisionVSAvoidplanar area of crystal element
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by forming a protective film on specific regions (corner portions and side surfaces) before the etching process. This protective film prevents excessive etching at these locations, allowing the main surfaces to be etched to the required angles while preserving the corner portions and maintaining the overall planar area of the crystal element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If the planar area of the crystal element is reduced by etching, then the first to third surfaces can be formed, but the crystal impedance cannot be sufficiently improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface configurationVSAvoidcrystal impedance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective film is applied in advance to prevent unwanted etching, ensuring that the crystal element maintains its planar area while still achieving the required surface angles. This resolves the contradiction by allowing proper surface configuration without sacrificing the area needed for high crystal impedance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Volume of moving object

If photolithography and wet etching techniques are used to achieve compact crystal unit, then the device size is reduced, but the etching process creates triangular regions at corner portions that reduce the crystal element area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidcrystal element planar area
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The protective film is formed on corner portions and side surfaces before the wet etching process. This preliminary protection allows the photolithography and etching techniques to be used for device miniaturization while preventing the formation of triangular etched regions at the corners, thereby maintaining the full planar area of the crystal element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the crystal element has wide planar area for better CI, then the impedance can be improved, but the device cannot be sufficiently compact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal impedanceVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By applying the protective film before etching, the crystal element can maintain its maximum planar area (improving CI) while the overall device size is kept compact through the use of photolithography and precise etching techniques. The protective film ensures that no area is lost to excessive etching, maximizing the crystal element area within the compact device footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed design and manufacturing method result in improved crystal impedance (CI) by maintaining a wider planar area and reducing unnecessary vibrations, with corner angles and dimensions optimized to achieve a CI average value of 83.5Ω and standard deviation of 6.6Ω, surpassing conventional devices.

Implementation Method 1

a piezoelectric device, such as a crystal unit, a crystal controlled oscillator including the crystal unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11824516B2Piezoelectric device and manufacturing method of the same
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 NIHON DEMPA KOGYO CO LTD
  • US11824516B2 patent drawing
  • US11824516B2 patent drawing
  • US11824516B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A piezoelectric device includes a container and an AT-cut crystal element. The AT-cut crystal element has at least one side surface intersecting with a Z′-axis of the crystallographic axis of the crystal constituted of three surfaces. The first surface is a surface equivalent to a surface formed by rotating the principal surface by 4°±3.5° with an X-axis of the crystal as a rotation axis. The second surface is a surface equivalent to a surface formed by rotating the principal surface by −57°±5° with the X-axis. The third surface is a surface equivalent to a surface formed by rotating the principal surface by −42°±5° with the X-axis. When two corner portions on a side of a second side opposed to the first side of the AT-cut crystal element are viewed in plan view, each of the two corner portions have an approximately right angle.