AT-Cut Crystal Sidewall Geometry for Lower Vibration Leakage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The downsizing of AT-cut crystal units has made it challenging to manufacture crystal elements using mechanical processing methods, leading to a need for alternative techniques such as photolithography and wet etching to produce AT-cut crystal elements with specific side surface configurations that minimize vibration leakage and enhance properties.

Innovation Solution

An AT-cut crystal element is designed with two side surfaces intersecting the Z′-axis, each composed of three surfaces, where the surfaces are rotated relative to the crystallographic axes to achieve specific angles and dimensions, optimizing the conversion percentage from thickness twist to surface-shear vibration, thereby reducing vibration leakage and improving unit properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mechanical processing is used to manufacture crystal elements, then manufacturing precision can be maintained, but it becomes difficult to manufacture as crystal units are downsized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal element manufacturing precisionVSAvoidmanufacturability of downsized crystal units
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical processing methods with photolithography and wet etching techniques to manufacture AT-cut crystal elements. This substitution enables precise manufacturing of downsized crystal units while maintaining manufacturing precision, as photolithography allows for accurate pattern transfer and wet etching provides controlled material removal at small scales where mechanical processing becomes inadequate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If side surfaces are configured with multiple surfaces to reduce vibration leakage, then crystal unit properties are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal unit properties and vibration leakage reductionVSAvoidside surface configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes specific parameters of the side surfaces, including the number of surfaces (three surfaces per Z′-surface), the angles of each surface relative to crystallographic axes (first surface at 4°±3.5°, second surface at -57.5°±3.5°, third surface at -42°±3.5°), and the dimensions (length D and thickness t with ratio M=D/t). By carefully controlling these parameters, the patent achieves reduced vibration leakage and improved crystal unit properties while managing the complexity through standardized geometric configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If conversion percentage from thickness twist to surface-shear vibration is reduced, then vibration leakage is minimized, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration leakage minimizationVSAvoidsurface angle and dimension precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges for surface angles (4°±3.5°, -57.5°±3.5°, -42°±3.5°) and dimensional ratios (M=D/t) that optimize the conversion percentage from thickness twist to surface-shear vibration. By defining these parameter ranges, the patent achieves reduced vibration leakage (conversion percentage at predetermined value Th or less) while providing manufacturing guidance that balances precision requirements with practical manufacturability through photolithography and wet etching processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized AT-cut crystal element with specific surface configurations achieves reduced vibration leakage and enhanced properties, as evidenced by lower impedance values and improved frequency stability, allowing for more precise control over crystal unit design and performance.

Implementation Method 1

AT-cut crystal element - refers to a crystal element using a cut which is AT-cut with respect to a crystallographic axis of a crystal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10250225B2AT-cut crystal element, crystal resonator and crystal unit
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 NIHON DEMPA KOGYO CO LTD
  • US10250225B2 patent drawing
  • US10250225B2 patent drawing
  • US10250225B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An AT-cut crystal element includes a crystal element having two side surfaces (namely, a Z′-surface) intersecting with a Z-axis of a crystallographic axis thereof. At least one of the two side surfaces is constituted of three of first to third surfaces. The first to the third surfaces meeting following conditions: the first to the third surfaces intersect with one another in this order and formed by rotating a principal surface of the crystal element by predetermined angles; and expressing the angle of the first surface as θ1, a length of the first surface as D, a thickness of a part of the crystal element having the principal surface as t, and M=D/t, and a conversion percentage as fn (M, (θ1)), the θ1 and the M are set such that the conversion percentage fn (M, (θ1)) becomes a predetermined value Th or less.