Master-Slave ATM Power Management via Dynamic State Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ATMs and similar computing devices consume high amounts of energy continuously, leading to increased costs and CO2 emissions, as they lack the ability to manage energy usage based on peak times, usage, or geographical location.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method where a master computing device communicates with multiple slave ATMs to determine which ATMs to put into standby or off mode, utilizing data on their status and capability, and employing machine learning to optimize power reduction while ensuring customer services are maintained.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ATMs are kept continuously powered on to ensure customer service availability, then service reliability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the power state of ATMs based on real-time demand conditions. ATMs transition between active and standby states according to usage patterns, ensuring service availability when needed while reducing power consumption during low-demand periods. The master computing device continuously monitors and reconfigures the operational state of each ATM in the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning ATMs in standby mode during periods of low expected usage, while maintaining the capability to quickly activate them when demand increases. Usage pattern analysis enables the system to anticipate demand and adjust power states proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple ATMs are kept active across an estate to serve customers, then service coverage is improved, but total power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidtotal power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the control functions of multiple ATMs under a single master computing device that manages the entire network. By consolidating control and using centralized intelligence, the system can coordinate ATM states across the estate, ensuring adequate service coverage while optimizing total power consumption through shared decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by keeping only the necessary number of ATMs active based on actual demand, rather than maintaining all ATMs in a continuous active state. The master computing device determines the optimal subset of ATMs to keep active, allowing the system to provide sufficient service coverage with minimal power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If ATMs operate without centralized control to maintain independence, then operational autonomy is improved, but energy management efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational autonomyVSAvoidenergy management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The master computing device acts as an intermediary between individual ATMs and the central control system. Each ATM maintains its operational independence while communicating with the master device, which coordinates power state decisions across the network. This intermediary approach preserves ATM autonomy while enabling centralized energy management optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where ATMs report their operational status and usage data to the master computing device, which then adjusts power state commands accordingly. This continuous feedback mechanism enables energy-efficient decision-making while maintaining the operational autonomy of individual ATMs, as each ATM responds to directed commands rather than operating in complete isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12287692B2Method for reducing power usage at a remote terminal
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 NCR VOYIX CORP
  • US12287692B2 patent drawing
  • US12287692B2 patent drawing
  • US12287692B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computing device, computing system and computer program which receive, by at least one first computing device of a plurality of computing devices, and from a master computing device in communication with each of the plurality of computing devices, at least one command for changing a state of at least one user interface device of the first computing device; and responsive to receiving the command, change a state of at least one said user interface device from a first state with a first power usage to a second state with a second power usage that is less than the first power usage, thereby reducing the power usage of the first computing device.