ATM Exception Balancing System for Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated teller machine (ATM) transactions create difficulties in reconciliation processes for financial institutions due to their unique 'footprint' differing from traditional lobby teller transactions, making it challenging to include them in existing reconciliation systems.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that accesses batches of image ATM transactions, calculates debits and credits, creates exception records for mismatches, displays these to analysts, and allows them to resolve exceptions by updating the general ledger, including options for general ledger entries, customer adjustments, or inter-office clearing accounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If ATM transactions are processed through existing lobby teller reconcilement processes, then standard reconciliation can be applied, but the unique footprint of ATM transactions makes them incompatible with current processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconciliation process compatibilityVSAvoidreconciliation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments ATM transaction reconciliation into distinct components: image capture module, transaction data extraction module, exception identification module, and resolution module. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific aspects of the reconciliation process, making the overall system adaptable to ATM transactions while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary exception record structure that bridges ATM transactions and the general ledger. This intermediary layer captures transaction images and data, identifies exceptions, and facilitates resolution through analyst review, thereby adapting the reconciliation process to accommodate ATM transaction footprints without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual review of all ATM transactions is performed, then accurate reconciliation can be achieved, but processing time and operational costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconciliation accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated processing of ATM transactions including image capture, data extraction, and initial validation before presenting exceptions for manual review. This preliminary action filters out routine transactions that can be processed automatically, reserving manual analyst review only for exceptional cases, thereby maintaining high accuracy while improving overall processing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where analyst resolutions of exceptions are fed back into the system to refine exception identification rules and improve automated processing. This continuous feedback mechanism enhances reconciliation accuracy over time while reducing the volume of transactions requiring manual review, thereby increasing processing speed without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If exception records are created for all debit-credit mismatches, then complete transaction tracking is achieved, but the volume of exceptions requiring analyst review increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction information completenessVSAvoidanalyst review time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by creating exception records with differentiated levels of detail and priority based on the specific nature of each debit-credit mismatch. Rather than treating all exceptions uniformly, the system tags exceptions with metadata indicating their significance, allowing analysts to prioritize review of critical exceptions while maintaining complete transaction information for audit purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters of exception records dynamically based on transaction characteristics, such as amount thresholds, transaction types, and patterns of occurrence. By adjusting exception creation and prioritization parameters, the system maintains comprehensive transaction tracking while reducing the number of low-priority exceptions that consume analyst time, thereby optimizing the balance between information completeness and review efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8078518B2ATM exception balancing system
Publication Date: 2011.12.13 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8078518B2 patent drawing
  • US8078518B2 patent drawing
  • US8078518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ATM exception balancing system is disclosed. Embodiments of the invention provide a method of resolving image ATM transaction exceptions and enabling reconcilement of ATM transactions. An exception record can be created and stored for each batch of image ATM transactions wherein the credit and the debit for the batch of image ATM transactions do not match, and the exception record can be displayed to an analyst. Input can be received from the analyst indicating a resolution of an exception. Possible resolutions can include a general ledger entry, a customer adjustment, and/or an ICA/WIP entry. The system can optionally provide for reporting and performance analysis. Image ATM cash transactions, image ATM check transactions, or both, can be included.