ATM Automated Loan Qualification and Variable Overdraft Fee System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Financial institutions face challenges in providing an automated means for customers to receive cash loans at ATMs when attempting to withdraw more than the available cash in their accounts, with existing overdraft protection services charging flat fees regardless of the credit amount and credit unions facing difficulties in collecting debts due to legal limitations.

Innovation Solution

An automated system and method that allows customers to qualify for a cash loan at an ATM by assessing the regularity of deposits in their accounts, offering a range of overdraft fees based on the credit extended, and enabling credit unions to use statutory liens on other accounts to collect debts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated loan qualification is implemented at ATM, then customer service convenience is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service convenienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated loan qualification where the ATM itself performs credit assessment and loan approval without requiring human teller intervention. The system automatically evaluates customer eligibility based on pre-established criteria and provides instant decisions, allowing the machine to serve itself in the loan qualification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Credit criteria and loan parameters are pre-configured in the system before ATM operations begin. The financial institution establishes loan eligibility rules, interest rates, and credit limits in advance, so that when a customer requests a loan at the ATM, the system can immediately apply these pre-set criteria without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If flat overdraft fees are charged, then administrative simplicity is maintained, but customer fairness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefee structure simplicityVSAvoidcustomer fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fee structure transitions from a uniform flat fee to differentiated fees based on local conditions - specifically the amount of credit extended and the customer's credit profile. Each loan transaction receives a customized fee assessment rather than a standardized charge, making the fee quality adaptive to the specific loan circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fee structure changes from a fixed parameter (flat fee) to a variable parameter that adjusts based on loan amount, credit score, and other financial metrics. The fee is calculated as a function of multiple parameters rather than a constant value, allowing the fee to scale appropriately with the loan characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If credit application process is required, then loan risk control is improved, but customer time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloan risk controlVSAvoidcustomer time consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Credit assessment criteria and customer financial profiles are established and stored in advance. When a customer requests a loan at the ATM, the system retrieves pre-collected financial data and applies pre-configured credit criteria, eliminating the need for time-consuming application processes while maintaining risk control through automated evaluation of pre-analyzed financial information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual credit application and review process is replaced with an automated electronic system. The ATM system automatically retrieves customer financial data, applies credit criteria, and makes loan decisions without human intervention, substituting the mechanical process of paper applications and manual review with an automated digital evaluation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20090089205A1Automated qualifying of a customer to receive a cash loan at an automated teller machine
Publication Date: 2009.04.02 BAYNE ANTHONY JEREMIAH
  • US20090089205A1 patent drawing
  • US20090089205A1 patent drawing
  • US20090089205A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated system and method for qualifying a customer to receive a cash loan at an ATM, when the customer attempts to withdraw more than the available cash from an account that receives regular deposits, and selecting a fee to charge for overdraft protection on a transactional basis. The fee amount is selected from a range of fees, and is dependent on the amount of overdraft protection provided, as a percentage of the transaction amount.