ATM Event Detection via Skeletal Similarity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting bank transfer fraud at ATMs require extensive training data and may infringe on user privacy, making them inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

An event detection system that calculates the similarity between skeletal information from captured images and registered phone call actions using a database, determining the occurrence of a suspicious event when the similarity threshold is met, without requiring specific pixel information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If learning-based action analysis is used to detect phone call actions, then detection capability is improved, but preparation cost and time increase due to large amounts of training data required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential skeletal information (positions and movements of key body parts) from the imaging information, separating it from unnecessary pixel data. This extraction allows detection to proceed without requiring large training datasets, thus reducing preparation time while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified skeletal models that copy only the essential movement patterns needed for detection. Instead of using complex pixel-level data requiring extensive training, the system uses simplified skeletal representations that can be processed with minimal training data, reducing both time and computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If pixel information is retained for accurate action detection, then detection precision is improved, but user privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidprivacy infringement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only skeletal information (positions and movements of key body parts) from the imaging data, deliberately excluding detailed pixel information. This extraction maintains sufficient precision for detecting phone call actions while removing personally identifiable visual features, thus protecting user privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The skeletal information serves as an intermediary representation between the original imaging data and the detection process. It preserves the essential movement patterns needed for accurate detection while acting as a privacy-protecting layer that prevents direct analysis of personal appearance and identity features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If traditional action analysis methods are used, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the imaging information processing into distinct stages: extracting skeletal information first, then analyzing only that skeletal data for action detection. This segmentation simplifies the overall system by breaking down the complex task of full image analysis into manageable steps, reducing computational requirements while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and isolates only the relevant skeletal information needed for detection, removing unnecessary pixel data processing from the system. This extraction simplifies the data processing pipeline and reduces system complexity while preserving the essential information needed for accurate action detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240338976A1Event detection system, event detection method, and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 NEC CORP
  • US20240338976A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338976A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338976A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An event detection system (10) includes: a calculation unit (16) that calculates a degree of similarity between at least a part of skeletal information extracted from a captured image in which a user who is visiting an ATM is captured and at least a part of registration skeletal information, the registration skeletal information being extracted from a registration image showing a phone call action of a person and being registered in an action database; and a determination unit (17) that determines that an event related to the ATM has been detected when the degree of similarity is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold. Thus, a problematic event at an ATM can be easily detected while protecting privacy.