Atmospheric Gas-Phase Fluorination of Plastics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluorination methods for plastics are complex and require vacuum-tight reaction chambers and vacuum pumps, making it difficult to treat pressure-sensitive plastic parts like foams and honeycomb structures without damaging them.

Innovation Solution

The method involves gas-phase fluorination at atmospheric pressure in a non-vacuum reaction chamber, using a fluorine-containing gas mixture with inert gases, allowing for the treatment of plastic parts without evacuation, and using elemental fluorine or halogen fluorides like XeF2 or XeF4, which reduces apparatus complexity and enables treatment of pressure-sensitive materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If vacuum-tight reaction chambers and vacuum pumps are used for fluorination, then fluorination can be performed, but the apparatus complexity increases and pressure-sensitive plastic parts cannot be treated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluorination process capabilityVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the vacuum environment with an inert gas atmosphere (nitrogen or argon) for fluorination. The reaction chamber is filled with inert gas to displace oxygen, creating a non-reactive environment that prevents unwanted oxidation while allowing fluorination to proceed. This eliminates the need for vacuum pumps and complex vacuum-tight sealing systems, significantly simplifying the apparatus while maintaining process effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Reliability

If vacuum evacuation is performed before fluorination, then oxygen is removed from the reaction chamber, but the complexity of the process and apparatus increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen removal effectivenessVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using vacuum evacuation to remove oxygen, the patent introduces an inert gas atmosphere that displaces oxygen from the reaction chamber. The inert gas (nitrogen or argon) is fed into the chamber at a controlled flow rate, creating a positive pressure environment that pushes oxygen out through exhaust ports. This method achieves effective oxygen removal without requiring vacuum systems, reducing both apparatus and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Device complexity

If atmospheric pressure fluorination is used, then the apparatus complexity is reduced, but oxygen removal becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus simplicityVSAvoidoxygen removal effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent solves the oxygen removal challenge at atmospheric pressure by continuously circulating inert gas through the reaction chamber. The inert gas is introduced at the bottom of the chamber and circulated upward, creating a displacement effect that pushes oxygen out through exhaust ports at the top. This circulation system, combined with the chemical inertness of the gas atmosphere, effectively removes oxygen without requiring vacuum conditions, maintaining both apparatus simplicity and process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the fluorination process, reduces the need for vacuum equipment, allows for the treatment of pressure-sensitive plastics, and achieves uniform surface modification with improved chemical resistance and thermal stability without damaging the materials.

Implementation Method 1

a gas-phase fluorination is carried out at atmospheric pressure in a reaction chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas-phase fluorination: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

The treatment of non-polar polymer materials with fluorine results in a polar surface owing to partial substitution of the CH bonds by CF groups

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial substitution of CH bonds by CF groups: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP1998881B1Method for the fluorination of plastics
Publication Date: 2019.08.28 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • EP1998881B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1998881B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The gas-phase fluorination of plastic articles is effected in a reaction chamber 1 into which the plastic articles to be fluorinated are introduced. The gas-phase fluorination is effected at normal or atmospheric ambient pressure of about IkPa in the reaction chamber. The gas-phase fluorination can be carried out statically or dynamically. The flushing carried out before the gas-phase fluorination for complete or partial removal of atmospheric pressure in the reaction chamber. The reaction chamber 1 is equipped with a cover 2 and metering valves VO, Vl, V2 for air, inert gas and gas mixture comprising fluorine and one or more inert gases are present on the entrance side of the reaction chamber, which is not vacuum-tight and hence also cannot be evacuated. The metering valves are connected to the reaction chamber 1 via a flow meter 4. A release valve V3 and a flow- through/ shut-off valve V4 are arranged in an exhaust gas line 8 of the reaction chamber 1. The reaction chamber may comprise a rotating drum.