Atom Trapping Waveguide Modulation With Multiplexed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scalability of control circuitry for optical modulation in atom trapping devices is a significant challenge, particularly in integrating waveguides and modulation arrangements, which limits the efficient control over light application in quantum computing environments.

Innovation Solution

A device is proposed with a multiplexer arrangement to control control signals for modulation arrangements, allowing for reduced channels and faster switching, and separate offset and amplitude modulation arrangements to account for fabrication variations, enabling efficient optical modulation of light guided by waveguides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If separate control signal generators are provided for each modulation arrangement, then precise control over light modulation is achieved, but device complexity and number of control channels increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol circuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple control signal generators are merged into a single control signal generator that provides a common control signal to multiple modulation arrangements. This reduces the number of control channels and simplifies the control circuitry while maintaining coordinated control across all modulation arrangements through the shared control signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

A single control signal generator is designed to serve multiple modulation arrangements simultaneously, making it a universal control source. This multi-functional approach allows one generator to control multiple waveguides and modulation arrangements, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining precise control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If more control channels are provided for each modulation arrangement, then individual control over each waveguide is improved, but scalability of the device is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual control capabilityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture merges multiple control channels into a shared control signal that is distributed to multiple modulation arrangements. This approach maintains individual control capability through the multiplexer arrangement while improving scalability by reducing the total number of control channels required as the system expands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control signal distribution transitions from a one-to-one mapping to a one-to-many mapping through the multiplexer arrangement. This dimensional change in control signal routing allows a single control channel to effectively control multiple waveguides, enabling system scalability without proportional increases in control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control signal generators are used, then control flexibility is improved, but the number of control channels and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of control channels
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple control signal generators are merged into a single generator that produces control signals distributed through a multiplexer arrangement. This maintains control flexibility by allowing selective activation of different modulation arrangements while reducing device complexity by eliminating redundant control signal generators and their associated control channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If separate modulation arrangements are provided for each waveguide, then precise optical modulation is achieved, but integration density and scalability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical modulation precisionVSAvoiddevice area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple modulation arrangements are merged into a shared infrastructure where a single multiplexer arrangement distributes control signals to multiple modulation elements. This maintains precise optical modulation for each waveguide while reducing device area by eliminating redundant control circuitry and enabling closer integration of modulation elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the number of control signal generators needed and enhances the scalability and control over light modulation, improving the precision and efficiency of atom trapping in quantum computing devices.

Implementation Method 1

at least one waveguide configured to guide light for application to the atom trap location

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWaveguide: Waveguide (optics)

Implementation Method 2

a modulation arrangement configured to controllably perform optical modulation on light guided by the waveguide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentEP4679335A1A device for trapping atoms
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • EP4679335A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4679335A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4679335A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An atom trapping device having waveguides for guiding light for application to a plurality of atom trapping locations. Modulation arrangements are configured to perform optical modulation of light carried by the waveguides responsive to any control signals provided thereto. A multiplexer arrangement is configured to control which, if any, control signal(s), generated by one or more control signal generators, are provided to each modulation arrangement.