Atomic Interferometer Automatic Biasing and Closed Loop Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Precision atomic interferometric gyroscopes face challenges in maintaining zero phase difference and linear response at high rotation rates, particularly due to stringent optical alignment requirements and mechanical manipulation limitations.

Innovation Solution

A system with a laser control system and feedback control system that adjusts the pointing angle of laser beams to compensate for rotations, using electro-optics for stability and automatic biasing, enabling closed-loop operation and maintaining signal sensitivity at arbitrary rotation rates without moving parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mechanical manipulation of beam angles is used to induce spatial variation of phase, then phase biasing is achieved, but device complexity and mechanical instability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase biasing capabilityVSAvoidmechanical manipulation requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical beam angle manipulation with electro-optic phase modulation. The phase modulator is driven by voltage signals that induce the desired phase variations in the laser beams without any mechanical movement, thereby eliminating mechanical complexity and instability while achieving the same phase biasing effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from mechanical beam angle to electrical voltage signal. By modulating the phase of the laser beams through electro-optic effects driven by voltage signals, the system achieves phase biasing without mechanical manipulation, transforming a mechanical control problem into an electrical control problem that is easier to implement and stabilize.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If optical alignment is performed manually to meet stringent requirements, then interferometer performance is optimized, but alignment difficulty and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical alignment precisionVSAvoidalignment difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system that continuously monitors the interferometer output and automatically adjusts the phase modulator drive signals to maintain optimal alignment. This closed-loop feedback eliminates the need for manual alignment adjustments and maintains precise optical alignment dynamically during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-alignment through automatic feedback control. The interferometer monitors its own performance and automatically adjusts its own alignment through the feedback-controlled phase modulators, eliminating the need for external manual alignment procedures and reducing both difficulty and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If phase manipulation is used to null output phase for linear response, then measurement linearity is improved, but applicability to high rotation rates is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse linearityVSAvoidapplicability to high rotation rates
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the phase modulation dynamic and adaptable. The phase modulator drive signals are continuously adjusted based on feedback from the interferometer output, allowing the system to dynamically adapt to varying rotation rates while maintaining linear response. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to operate effectively across a wide range of rotation rates unlike static phase manipulation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures a linear output signal, improved stability against environmental changes, and automatic leveling in two dimensions, effectively maintaining the atomic signal's sensitivity and compensating for optical assembly imperfections and rotation effects.

Implementation Method 1

A light-pulse atom interferometer uses optical pulses that interact with ensembles of atoms... The phases and direction of the optical pulses can be manipulated in order to bias the output phase of the interferometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-optic effect: Electro-Optic Effects

Implementation Method 2

An atom interferometer exploits the wave-like properties of atoms to sensitively measure small differences between different spatial trajectories. It does this by measuring the interference effects that result when it manipulates a beam of atoms such that the atomic wave packets split into two or more components and subsequently recombine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomic interference: Interference

Implementation Method 3

A light-pulse atom interferometer uses optical pulses that interact with ensembles of atoms... The phases and direction of the optical pulses can be manipulated in order to bias the output phase of the interferometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical pumping:

Data Source

PatentUS10444016B1Automatic biasing and closed loop control of an atomic interferometer
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 AOSENSE
  • US10444016B1 patent drawing
  • US10444016B1 patent drawing
  • US10444016B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for an atomic interferometer includes a laser control system and a feedback control system. The laser control system controls a first pointing angle of a first interrogating laser beam. The first interrogating laser beam and a second interrogating laser beam interrogate a pair of almost counter-propagating laser cooled atomic ensembles. The feedback control system adjusts the first pointing angle based at least in part on an inertial measurement using the atomic interferometer to bias an output of the atomic interferometer to compensate for the effects of rotations. The pointing angle of the laser beam, which is linearly related to a frequency used to drive an acousto-optic deflector, is linearly related to the rotation rate of the sensor.