Atomic Message Sequencing for ACID Distributed Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implementing ACID compliant transactions in distributed computing systems, particularly distributed databases, is challenging due to the complexity and inefficiencies of existing techniques like the Saga design pattern and Two-Phase Commit protocol.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a sequencer that communicates an atomic message sequence to multiple service instances, where each instance processes messages through a local queue and executes a state machine to perform distributed transactions, ensuring ACID compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the Two-Phase Commit protocol is used to implement ACID transactions in distributed systems, then transaction atomicity and consistency are ensured, but system complexity and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveACID transaction complianceVSAvoidtransaction protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the distributed transaction processing into independent service instances, each maintaining its own local state machine and processing transactions autonomously. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex centralized coordination protocols while preserving ACID properties through local transaction logs and state machines that operate independently but consistently across the distributed system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an event stream as an intermediary mechanism that carries transaction events between service instances. This event stream serves as a lightweight mediator that replaces the complex two-phase commit coordination, allowing service instances to process transactions independently while maintaining consistency through the shared event log, thereby reducing protocol complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the Two-Phase Commit protocol is used to implement ACID transactions in distributed systems, then transaction atomicity is ensured, but processing speed and efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction atomicityVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by maintaining local transaction logs and state machines at each service instance before actual transaction execution. This allows service instances to pre-validate transactions and prepare commit decisions locally, eliminating the need for slow centralized coordination during transaction execution, thereby improving processing speed while maintaining atomicity guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables self-service by allowing each service instance to independently process and commit transactions using its own state machine and local log, without requiring synchronization with other instances during the commit process. This self-service approach dramatically improves transaction processing speed while maintaining atomicity through the use of distributed event logs that ensure consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If distributed databases are implemented to provide redundancy and fault tolerance, then system reliability improves, but achieving ACID compliant transactions becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidACID transaction implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the distributed database into independent service instances, each with its own state machine and local processing capability. This segmentation allows each instance to handle transactions independently with full ACID compliance locally, while the distributed architecture provides fault tolerance. The complexity of ACID implementation is reduced to local operations rather than distributed coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies homogeneity by using identical state machines and transaction processing logic across all service instances. This homogeneous approach simplifies ACID implementation because each instance operates with the same rules and mechanisms, making it easier to maintain consistency across the distributed system while providing fault tolerance through redundancy of identical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Data Source

PatentUS12554700B2Distributed stream-based acid transactions
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 NASDAQ INC
  • US12554700B2 patent drawing
  • US12554700B2 patent drawing
  • US12554700B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for processing distributed transactions is provided. The system includes a sequencer that communicates an atomic message stream to multiple different service instances. The service instances each process the messages from the message stream into a local queue. Each service instance also executes a state machine by reading messages from a queue and transitioning between states in the state machine while also performing one or more operations in connection with performing a distributed transaction.