Atomic Operation Merging for Graphics Processing Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for processing atomic operations in graphics data processing systems are inefficient due to serial processing when multiple SIMD slots map to the same address, leading to prolonged processing times and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

A novel technique that detects and merges multiple atomic operations with the same memory address into a single atomic operation, allowing for simultaneous execution, thereby reducing the number of required cycles and enhancing processing speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If atomic operations are processed serially when multiple SIMD slots map to the same address, then correctness of atomic operations is maintained, but processing speed deteriorates significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrectness of atomic operationsVSAvoidprocessing speed of atomic operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple atomic operations targeting the same memory address into a single atomic operation. When multiple SIMD slots map to the same address, their operations are combined into one atomic operation that processes all slots simultaneously, eliminating the need for serial execution while maintaining atomicity and correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a universal atomic operation mechanism that can handle multiple slots with the same address through a single operation. This multi-functional approach allows the same atomic operation infrastructure to serve both single-slot and multi-slot scenarios, improving speed without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If atomic operations are processed in parallel, then processing efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases due to conflict resolution requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiency of atomic operationsVSAvoidcomplexity of atomic operation handling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple atomic operations into a single operation, the patent eliminates the need for complex conflict resolution logic. The merging approach allows parallel processing of multiple slots while maintaining simplicity in the atomic operation handling mechanism, as the system only needs to manage one atomic operation per unique address rather than coordinating multiple concurrent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If multiple atomic operations are executed sequentially, then resource conflicts are avoided, but processing time increases proportionally with the number of operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavoidance of resource conflictsVSAvoidprocessing time for atomic operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple atomic operations targeting the same address into a single atomic operation, allowing all operations to be executed simultaneously in one cycle rather than sequentially over multiple cycles. This merging approach eliminates resource conflicts by design, as the combined operation inherently handles all slots atomically, while dramatically reducing processing time from N cycles to 1 cycle for N slots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11521294B2Efficient merging of atomic operations at computing devices
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 INTEL CORP
  • US11521294B2 patent drawing
  • US11521294B2 patent drawing
  • US11521294B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanism is described for facilitating dynamic merging of atomic operations in computing devices. A method of embodiments, as described herein, includes facilitating detecting atomic messages and a plurality of slot addresses. The method further includes comparing one or more slot addresses of the plurality of slot addresses with other slot addresses of the plurality of slot addresses to seek one or more matched slot addresses, where the one or more matched slot addresses are merged into one or more merged groups. The method may further include generating one or more merged atomic operations based on and corresponding to the one or more merged groups.