Atomic Operations in Compute-Near-Memory Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer architectures face performance and capacity constraints due to the time and energy required for data movement between processors and memory, limiting advancements beyond transistor scaling.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of compute-near-memory (CNM) systems, which integrate processors with memory or data storage components, utilizing a custom compute fabric and network structures to facilitate low-latency operations and support atomic operations, enabling efficient data access and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data is moved between processors and memory using conventional bus architecture, then system compatibility and ease of manufacture are maintained, but performance and capacity are constrained due to time and energy requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompute performanceVSAvoiddata movement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments memory access operations into atomic operations that can be executed independently and concurrently. Each atomic operation is a discrete unit that can be processed by multiple compute elements simultaneously, dividing the overall data access workload into smaller, parallelizable units that reduce total access time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of parallelism by enabling multiple compute elements to access and operate on memory locations simultaneously through atomic operations. This multi-dimensional access pattern breaks the conventional sequential access model, allowing throughput to scale with the number of compute elements rather than being bottlenecked by single-bus bandwidth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If data is moved between processors and memory using conventional bus architecture, then system simplicity is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload throughputVSAvoiddata movement energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Atomic operations enable compute elements to perform data manipulation directly at memory locations without requiring repeated data movement between processors and memory. The atomic operation units execute computations in-place, allowing data to serve itself through self-contained operations that combine data access and processing in a single energy-efficient step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges data access and data processing into unified atomic operations. Instead of separate read-modify-write cycles that consume multiple bus transactions, atomic operations combine these functions into single integrated units, reducing the total number of data movement operations and associated energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If atomic operations are implemented in hardware, then race conditions are prevented and reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverace condition preventionVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Atomic operation units serve as intermediary hardware components between compute elements and memory. These specialized units handle the complexity of atomic operations (lock management, conflict resolution, serialization) internally, shielding the rest of the system from complexity while ensuring reliable race-condition-free execution. The intermediaries translate high-level atomic operation requests into low-level coordinated memory access sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12197351B2Methods and systems for requesting atomic operations in a computing system
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12197351B2 patent drawing
  • US12197351B2 patent drawing
  • US12197351B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various examples are directed to systems and methods for requesting an atomic operation. A first hardware compute element may send a first request via a network structure, where the first request comprises an atomic opcode indicating an atomic operation to be performed by a second hardware compute element. The network structure may provide an address bus from the first hardware compute element for providing the atomic opcode to the second hardware compute element. The second hardware compute element may execute the atomic operation and send confirmation data indicating completion of the atomic operation. The network structure may provide a second bus from the second hardware compute element and the first hardware compute element. The second bus may be for providing the confirmation data from the second hardware compute element to the first hardware compute element.