Atomic Program Verification for Multi-Core Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multi-processing systems face challenges in executing custom sequences of instructions atomically, particularly due to complexity and performance degradation issues with general-purpose atomic instructions like CMPXCHG, which can lead to deadlock or livelock situations, and require complex hardware support.

Innovation Solution

A computer system is configured to validate and execute custom sequences of instructions as single atomic transactions with a guarantee of forward progress, using a validation agent to ensure the sequences meet specific atomicity criteria, allowing execution without memory access outside the cache line and employing a stack-based language for implicit atomicity guarantees.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If general-purpose atomic instructions like CMPXCHG are used to construct custom atomic logic, then programming flexibility is improved, but implementation complexity and execution speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming flexibilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the atomic execution into two distinct phases: a validation phase where a validation agent checks whether the instruction sequence meets atomicity criteria, and an execution phase where the sequence is executed atomically. This segmentation allows complex custom atomic logic to be validated before execution, resolving the contradiction between programming flexibility and implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation agent acts as an intermediary component between the programmer and the atomic execution unit. It receives custom instruction sequences, validates them against atomicity criteria, and only permits execution if validation succeeds. This intermediary resolves the contradiction by providing a systematic approach to managing complexity while maintaining programming flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If general-purpose atomic instructions are used to construct custom atomic logic, then programming flexibility is improved, but execution speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming flexibilityVSAvoidexecution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation agent performs preliminary validation of the instruction sequence before atomic execution begins. By checking atomicity criteria in advance (validating memory access patterns, register usage, and control flow), the system ensures that only eligible sequences are executed, preventing execution failures and optimizing performance by avoiding unnecessary validation during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical approach of using slow general-purpose atomic instructions with a more efficient system where custom instruction sequences are validated and executed as single atomic transactions. This substitution of the execution mechanism resolves the contradiction between programming flexibility and execution speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If custom instruction sequences are executed atomically, then forward progress guarantee is improved, but hardware complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward progress guaranteeVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation agent operates as a self-service component that automatically validates instruction sequences against atomicity criteria without requiring external intervention. It independently checks whether sequences meet the required properties and makes decisions about execution eligibility, providing forward progress guarantees through a self-managing validation process that minimizes hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If atomic instructions access memory outside cache line, then programming flexibility is improved, but atomicity guarantee deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming flexibilityVSAvoidatomicity guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The validation agent provides feedback about the memory access patterns of instruction sequences. It analyzes whether accessed memory locations are contained within the cache line and returns validation results to the execution unit. This feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain atomicity guarantees by rejecting sequences that access memory outside the cache line while still allowing flexible programming within the constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8793471B2Atomic program verification
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US8793471B2 patent drawing
  • US8793471B2 patent drawing
  • US8793471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for executing an atomic memory transaction comprises a processing core in a multi-processing core system, where the processing core is configured to store an atomic program in a cache line. The apparatus further comprises an atomic program execution unit that is configured to execute the atomic program as a single atomic memory transaction with a guarantee of forward progress.