ATP-Triggered NBD Immune Agonists for Localized Tumor Stimulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current immunotherapies face limitations such as toxicity, limited efficacy due to low TAA density, on-target/off-tumor toxicity, and safety concerns with stoichiometric enhancements, necessitating a more targeted and safer approach for tumor-specific immune stimulation.

Innovation Solution

Development of nucleotide binding domain (NBD)-containing constructs that assemble into dimers or higher order complexes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) using ATP as a trigger, enhancing immune cell stimulation and payload delivery, while minimizing systemic toxicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If systemic delivery of immune agonists is used, then broad distribution is achieved, but severe toxicity occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystemic deliveryVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by designing immune agonists that are activated specifically in the tumor microenvironment through pH-sensitive or enzyme-sensitive linkers. The therapeutic agent remains inactive in systemic circulation (pH 7.4) and is only activated in the acidic tumor microenvironment (pH 6.5-7.0), providing local therapeutic action while minimizing systemic toxicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses tumor-specific enzymes (such as matrix metalloproteinases) or acidic pH as intermediaries to trigger activation of the prodrug. These intermediaries are abundant in the tumor microenvironment but absent in normal tissues, enabling selective activation and reducing off-target effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If TAA-targeted immune agonists are used, then tumor specificity is improved, but low TAA density results in low efficacy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor targeting accuracyVSAvoidtherapeutic efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple targeting strategies by linking immune agonists to antibodies against multiple tumor-associated antigens simultaneously. This multi-targeting approach ensures that even if one TAA is expressed at low density, the cumulative effect of binding to multiple TAAs achieves sufficient tumor cell coverage and therapeutic efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite immunotherapeutic agents that integrate antibody targeting domains with immune agonist domains in a single molecular construct. This composite structure enables both specific tumor targeting and potent immune activation, overcoming the limitation of low TAA density by concentrating multiple functional elements in one molecule

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Power

If stoichiometric enhancement of immune agonists is used, then in vitro potency is improved, but severe toxicity occurs in clinical trials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune activation potencyVSAvoidsystemic toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control of immune agonist activity through conditional activation mechanisms. The immune agonist is delivered in an inactive prodrug form systemically and only becomes active upon encountering tumor-specific conditions (acidic pH or enzymes), dynamically switching from low systemic activity to high local activity at the tumor site

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the tumor microenvironment (particularly pH and enzyme presence) to control the activation state of the immune agonist. The chemical structure of the prodrug is designed to undergo conformational changes or cleavage in response to these parameter changes, transforming from an inactive to an active state selectively in the tumor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If intratumoral administration is used, then local concentration is improved, but surgical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal drug concentrationVSAvoiddelivery procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the immune agonist to be self-activating in response to tumor microenvironment conditions. After systemic administration, the prodrug automatically activates in the tumor without requiring surgical intervention or external triggers, achieving high local concentration through the body's own physiological parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The NBD-containing constructs provide potent, localized immune stimulation and enhanced payload delivery to tumors, reducing systemic side effects and increasing therapeutic index by leveraging universal ATP levels in TMEs.

Implementation Method 1

molecular constructs comprising nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) that enable the use of tumor ATP as a trigger for the conditional (ATP-dependent) assembly of potent cancer therapeutic agents at the tumor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectATP binding: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS20250257148A1ATP-Dependent Agonists of Immune Cells Function as Anticancer Agents
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 CROSSLINK THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US20250257148A1 patent drawing
  • US20250257148A1 patent drawing
  • US20250257148A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides polypeptide constructs that act as agonists of immune cell function when exposed to sufficient levels of ATP to cause their assembly into dimers or higher order complexes (e.g., trimers, tetramers, etc.). The constructs may also be conjugated to one or more therapeutic agent, chemotherapeutic agent, or labeling agent. The complexes of the constructs are capable of stimulating immune cells (e.g., cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and/or NK cells) that function to promote anti-tumor immune responses and delivering the conjugated agents into the tumor microenvironment. The constructs may be employed as anticancer agents/therapeutics for the treatment of solid tumors that have elevated levels of ATP.