ATR-based hydrogen process and plant

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrogen production methods are inefficient in terms of hydrocarbon feed and fuel consumption, leading to high energy costs and capital expenditures, particularly in plants based on steam methane reformers.

Innovation Solution

A hydrogen production process utilizing an autothermal reformer, high temperature shift section, CO2 removal, and hydrogen purification, with off-gas recycling to reduce steam consumption and eliminate the need for steam methane reformers, employing a promoted zinc-aluminum oxide catalyst to operate at lower steam-to-carbon ratios and incorporating off-gas recycling to enhance hydrogen recovery and reduce equipment size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If steam methane reformers are used for hydrogen production, then hydrogen can be produced, but hydrocarbon feed consumption and energy costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrocarbon feed consumptionVSAvoidenergy costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operating parameters by using an autothermal reformer that operates at lower steam-to-carbon ratios compared to conventional steam methane reformers. This parameter change reduces hydrocarbon feed consumption and energy costs while maintaining hydrogen production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The off-gas recycling system allows the process to serve itself by recovering hydrogen from off-gas and feeding it back into the reformer, reducing the need for additional hydrocarbon feed and external hydrogen sources, thereby lowering energy costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If conventional steam methane reformers are used, then hydrogen production is achieved, but capital expenditures increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidcapital expenditures
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By changing to an autothermal reforming process with lower steam-to-carbon ratios, the invention reduces equipment size requirements and capital expenditures while maintaining hydrogen production capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The off-gas recycling system increases hydrogen recovery efficiency, allowing for smaller equipment sizes and reduced capital expenditures by maximizing the utilization of hydrogen produced within the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If off-gas is recycled to the reformer, then hydrogen recovery is enhanced, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen recoveryVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the off-gas recycling stream with the main reformer feed stream, combining multiple functions into a single integrated process flow that enhances hydrogen recovery without proportionally increasing process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The off-gas recycling system implements a feedback mechanism where hydrogen-rich off-gas is recovered and fed back into the reformer, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that enhances hydrogen recovery while maintaining manageable process complexity through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces hydrocarbon feed consumption, energy usage, and capital expenditures while maintaining energy efficiency, allowing for smaller equipment sizes and lower CO2 emissions by operating at lower steam-to-carbon ratios and recycling off-gas streams within the process.

Implementation Method 1

the hydrocarbon feed is subjected to reforming in an autothermal reformer (ATR) for generating a synthesis gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReforming: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the synthesis gas to shift conversion step in a shift section including one or more shift steps for enriching the synthesis gas in hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShift conversion: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 3

treating the shifted gas in a hydrogen purification unit, such as a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure swing adsorption: Pressure Swing Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS12172896B2ATR-based hydrogen process and plant
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 HALDOR TOPSOE AS
  • US12172896B2 patent drawing
  • US12172896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plant and process for producing a hydrogen rich gas are provided, said process comprising the steps of: reforming a hydrocarbon feed in a reforming step thereby obtaining a synthesis gas comprising CH4, CO, CO2, H2 and H2O; shifting said synthesis gas in a shift configuration including a high temperature shift step; removal of CO2 upstream hydrogen purification unit, such as a pressure swing adsorption unit (PSA), and recycling off-gas from hydrogen purification unit and mix it with natural gas upstream prereformer feed preheater, prereformer, reformer feed preheater or ATR or shift as feed for the process.