Implantable Device Atrial Detection Using Interval Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing implantable medical devices face challenges in accurately sensing atrial events for ventricular pacing due to the difficulty in distinguishing atrial signals from ventricular signals, especially when placed in the ventricle, leading to potential false detections and oversensing of near-field signals.

Innovation Solution

An implantable medical device with a sensor arrangement and processing circuitry that detects atrial events by evaluating the atrial-ventricular interval, discarding signals that occur too close to ventricular events, and updating the sense threshold based on valid atrial detections to improve the accuracy of atrial signal identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical sensing modalities (motion, sound, pressure) are used to detect atrial contractions, then the device can provide ventricular pacing with atrial tracking, but the signal detection becomes difficult due to small signal volume and interference from ventricular activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatrial event detection reliabilityVSAvoidsignal detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical sensing modalities (accelerometers, pressure sensors, microphones) with electrical sensing using electrodes to detect atrial depolarization signals. This substitution eliminates the fundamental limitation of mechanical sensors that cannot reliably distinguish small mechanical signals from ventricular interference, while electrical signals provide clear temporal separation between atrial and ventricular events for reliable VDD pacing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the implantable medical device is placed in the ventricle to provide ventricular pacing, then leadless pacemaker advantages are achieved, but atrial signal sensing becomes difficult due to distance from the atrium

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleadless implantation easeVSAvoidatrial signal sensing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical sensing with electrical sensing to overcome the distance attenuation problem. Electrical depolarization signals can be detected at lower amplitudes with clear waveform characteristics (P-waves) that remain distinguishable even when recorded from the ventricle, whereas mechanical signals decay rapidly with distance and become indistinguishable from ventricular mechanical activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sensing parameter from mechanical properties (motion, pressure, sound) to electrical properties (voltage, current). This parameter change allows detection of atrial events at ventricular locations because electrical signals maintain their characteristic waveform morphology and temporal relationships even when sensed from a distance, unlike mechanical signals that lose amplitude and specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If signal threshold is lowered to detect weak atrial signals, then detection sensitivity increases, but false detection of ventricular signals as atrial events increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatrial signal detection sensitivityVSAvoidsignal identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary filtering and waveform analysis before threshold detection. By pre-processing the electrical signal to enhance P-wave characteristics and suppress ventricular signal components, the system can use higher thresholds without losing sensitivity, thereby avoiding false detections while maintaining detection of genuine atrial events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where detected events are validated by checking temporal relationships with subsequent ventricular events. If a detected atrial event occurs too close to a ventricular event (within the refractory period), it is rejected as a false detection. This feedback validation maintains high sensitivity while eliminating false positives from ventricular signal contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240075299A1An Implantable Medical Device Configured to Provide an Intra-Cardiac Function
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 BIOTRONIK SE & CO KG
  • US20240075299A1 patent drawing
  • US20240075299A1 patent drawing
  • US20240075299A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An implantable medical device configured to provide for an intracardiac function, the implantable medical device comprises a body, a sensor arrangement arranged on the body and configured to receive cardiac sense signals, and a processing circuitry operatively connected to the sensor arrangement. The processing circuitry is configured to process cardiac sense signals received using the sensor arrangement to detect a signal deflection potentially indicative of an atrial event caused by atrial activity to obtain an atrial detection, to detect a signal deflection indicative of a ventricular event caused by ventricular activity succeeding said atrial detection, to determine an atrial-ventricular interval representing a time between the atrial detection and the ventricular event, and to identify the atrial detection as valid or invalid based on the atrial-ventricular interval.