ATS Timetable-Based Garage Door Control for Urban Rail Transit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing urban rail transit projects lack remote automatic control of garage doors, which is necessary to improve automation levels, save energy, and protect equipment in northern Chinese cities, especially in relation to the ATS timetable for train entry and exit times.

Innovation Solution

An Automatic garage door control system and method based on ATS timetable, comprising a garage door plan management module, a garage door information maintenance module, and a garage door control processing module, which enables remote automatic control of garage doors by processing entry and exit plans and sending control commands and alarms accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual local control of garage doors is used, then operation simplicity is maintained, but automation level remains low and requires continuous manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The garage door control system automatically executes door opening/closing operations based on train entry/exit data from the ATS timetable without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously processing schedule information and generating control commands, thereby improving automation level while maintaining manageable complexity through rule-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes the ATS timetable data to extract train entry and exit times before actual garage door operations are needed. By preparing control schedules in advance based on predetermined train schedules, the system achieves high automation without complex real-time decision-making, resolving the contradiction between automation level and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If garage doors remain closed during off-hours, then energy is saved and equipment is protected, but timely access is delayed when trains arrive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiddoor opening response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and prepares garage door opening times in advance by processing the ATS timetable data before train operations begin. By determining optimal door opening schedules beforehand based on predicted train arrivals, the system ensures doors open timely when needed while remaining closed during off-hours to save energy and protect equipment, thus resolving the time-energy trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual train entry/exit operations and compares them with the predetermined schedule. When discrepancies are detected (such as unscheduled train arrivals), the system adjusts future door operations accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures energy efficiency through scheduled operations while maintaining timely response to actual operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control modes are implemented, then adaptability to different scenarios is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol scenario flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into distinct operational modes: automatic mode (based on ATS timetable), manual mode (operator-initiated), and alarm mode (for abnormal conditions). Each mode has dedicated processing logic that is simpler than a fully integrated system. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to different scenarios while keeping individual control logic modules manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a unified control architecture that handles multiple operational scenarios through a common processing framework. The garage door control unit can execute different control strategies (automatic scheduling, manual commands, alarm responses) through a single multi-functional system rather than separate dedicated systems for each scenario, thereby improving versatility without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250129656A1Automatic garage door control system and method based on ATS timetable
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 CASCO SIGNAL LTD
  • US20250129656A1 patent drawing
  • US20250129656A1 patent drawing
  • US20250129656A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an Automatic garage door control system and method based on ats timetable, which are used for implementing remote automatic control of garage doors. The ATS timetable-based automatic control system comprises a garage door plan management module, a garage door information maintenance module and a garage door control processing module, wherein the garage door control processing module outputs garage door control commands and alarm events according to times calculated by the garage door plan management module and garage door basic information provided by the garage door information maintenance module. Compared with the prior art, the invention realizes automatic processing, provides multiple options, and is good in timeliness and practicability.