Working Vehicle Attachment Tower Massive Forming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current working vehicle attachment towers are manufactured as welded assembly groups or cast components, limiting their strength, geometry, and manufacturing options, which restricts their ability to support higher loads and optimize constructional space.

Innovation Solution

The working vehicle attachment tower is manufactured using a massive forming process for the supporting body, allowing for higher strength and varied geometry, with separate manufacturing of the front loader attachment body and supporting body using different materials and processes, and welding them together.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the supporting body is manufactured as a welded assembly group or cast component, then the manufacturing process is conventional and straightforward, but the strength and mechanical properties are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from conventional welding or casting processes to a massive forming process. This process parameter change enables the production of supporting bodies with superior mechanical properties, including higher strength and improved material grain structure, while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through specialized forming equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical joining methods (welding) or thermal processing (casting) with a massive forming process. This substitution eliminates the need for post-manufacturing assembly or heat treatment steps, directly producing a monolithic supporting body with optimized structural integrity and mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Shape

If the supporting body is manufactured as a welded assembly group or cast component, then the manufacturing approach is conventional, but the geometry and design flexibility are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovegeometryVSAvoidmanufacturing approach
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The massive forming process enables complex geometric configurations that are difficult or impossible to achieve with conventional welding or casting. The process parameters can be adjusted to create varying cross-sections, integrated features, and optimized load paths within a single monolithic structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent separates the attachment tower into two independently manufactured components (front loader attachment body and supporting body) that are subsequently joined. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized separately using different manufacturing processes and materials, then combined through welding to achieve the final complex geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the attachment tower uses a single manufacturing process for both components, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the material selection and process optimization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selectionVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment tower is divided into two separately manufacturable components: the front loader attachment body and the supporting body. This segmentation enables the use of different materials and manufacturing processes for each component based on their specific functional requirements, then combines them through welding to create the final assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different material parameters and process parameters can be selected for each component based on their specific requirements. The front loader attachment body may use materials optimized for wear resistance, while the supporting body uses materials optimized for structural strength, with each manufactured using the most appropriate process for its function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the supporting body has a conventional design, then the manufacturing is straightforward, but the line-of-sight obstruction is greater

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline-of-sight obstructionVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The massive forming process enables the creation of a supporting body with optimized cross-sectional geometry that minimizes material usage while maintaining strength. This results in a more compact design that reduces line-of-sight obstruction, with the material grain structure flowing continuously through the form to ensure structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the mechanical properties, strength, and design flexibility of the attachment tower, enabling it to support higher loads and reduce line-of-sight obstruction, while allowing for different material choices and manufacturing processes to optimize manufacturing effort and cost.

Implementation Method 1

a process wherein a three-dimensional blank is deformed three-dimensionally wherein in the massive forming process the blank preferably undergoes plastic deformations in three dimensional directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

After the separate manufacturing the front loader attachment body and the supporting body are welded to each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS20230076701A1Working vehicle attachment tower, working vehicle attachment device, set of a plurality of working vehicle attachment towers and method for manufacturing a working vehicle attachment tower
Publication Date: 2023.03.09 WILHELM STOLL MASCHFAB
  • US20230076701A1 patent drawing
  • US20230076701A1 patent drawing
  • US20230076701A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a working vehicle attachment tower which comprises a front loader mounting body and a supporting body. The front loader mounting body and the supporting body are manufactured as separate parts and welded to each other by at least one weld seam. The supporting body is manufactured by use of a massive forming process. Furthermore, the invention relates to a set of a plurality of working vehicle attachment towers and a method for manufacturing a working vehicle attachment tower.