Attack Tree Security Monitoring for Automated Compliance Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cybersecurity methods require manual operations for continuous maintenance, lack expertise, and are incomplete and ineffective in maintaining system security, especially in high-value military and civilian IT systems, making them vulnerable to cyber-attacks.

Innovation Solution

An analytic server implements an automated security compliance and monitoring tool that generates an attack tree model to detect cyber-attacks, calculates impact scores, and automatically responds to mitigate threats, ensuring continuous system compliance and reducing attack surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual operations are used for continuous maintenance of system security, then users can monitor and update systems, but users lack expertise and cannot make effective system assessment and incident response decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidmanual monitoring and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-assessment and self-monitoring through automated agents that continuously evaluate security compliance, detect vulnerabilities, and respond to threats without requiring manual user intervention. The automated security compliance system maintains security configurations and generates reports autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations of security monitoring and maintenance are replaced with an automated software-based system that uses agents, compliance rules, and automated response mechanisms to perform security assessments and incident response, eliminating the need for manual expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional cybersecurity methods are used, then some security monitoring is performed, but the methods are incomplete and time-consuming, requiring continuous manual operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidtime for manual operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous security monitoring and compliance assessment through automated agents that operate continuously without interruption. The automated system performs ongoing security evaluations, vulnerability scans, and compliance checks without requiring periodic manual intervention, ensuring uninterrupted security protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Time-consuming manual security operations are completely replaced by an automated system that performs compliance assessments, vulnerability detection, and incident response automatically, eliminating the time loss associated with manual security maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If system configurations are updated and patched during system lifetime, then security vulnerabilities are addressed, but maintaining compliance becomes difficult and attack surfaces increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability protectionVSAvoidcompliance maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where automated agents monitor configuration changes, assess compliance status, and automatically adjust security settings to maintain compliance. The system provides real-time feedback on compliance status and automatically responds to configuration drift, making compliance maintenance straightforward despite system updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts security parameters and compliance configurations based on detected threats and system state changes. Automated agents modify security settings, update compliance rules, and reconfigure system parameters automatically in response to vulnerability patches and configuration changes, simplifying compliance maintenance during system evolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated security compliance is implemented, then system assessment and response are automated, but the system requires sophisticated monitoring and analysis capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated system assessmentVSAvoidmonitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated security system is divided into separate functional agents, each responsible for specific tasks such as compliance monitoring, vulnerability assessment, threat detection, and incident response. This segmentation allows the complex monitoring system to be broken down into manageable, specialized components that work together to achieve automated security management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12526319B1Automated security compliance for system nodes
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 ARCHITECTURE TECH CORP
  • US12526319B1 patent drawing
  • US12526319B1 patent drawing
  • US12526319B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are embodiments of systems, methods, and products comprise an analytic server, which improves security of a system. The analytic server may monitor the system by retrieving status information from various devices within the system. The analytic server may generate an attack tree model based on a set of aggregation rules that are configured based on the monitored status information. The analytic server may detect one or more attacks by associating the status information with corresponding nodes of the attack tree model and executing a logic of the attack tree model. The analytic server may determine aggregated impact and risk metrics and calculate an impact score for each attack based on aggregated impact and risk metrics. The analytic server may generate reports comprising the one or more attacks ranked based on the impact scores. The analytic server may respond to one or more attacks by taking automated actions.