Attention Model Drug Sensitivity Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting drug sensitivity, particularly in tumor treatment, face challenges due to the loss of information during feature extraction and compression using Autoencoders, leading to poor performance in drug sensitivity prediction.

Innovation Solution

The method involves acquiring gene expression and mutation information, calculating correlation information using attention models, splicing the results, and processing them through a drug sensitivity prediction model to improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If Autoencoders are used for feature extraction and compression, then the model structure is simplified, but information loss occurs leading to poor prediction performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structureVSAvoidfeature information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an attention mechanism as an intermediary between the input features and the prediction model. This attention mechanism selectively weights different feature dimensions, allowing the model to focus on the most relevant information while discarding less important features, thereby avoiding the information loss inherent in Autoencoder compression while maintaining model simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the fixed compression ratio of Autoencoders into a dynamic parameter system through attention weights. By changing the parameters from static dimensionality reduction to dynamic feature weighting, the model can adaptively adjust which features to preserve and which to discard, resolving the contradiction between simplification and information preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple types of data (gene expression, mutation, drug structure) are integrated, then prediction accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the integration process into distinct attention mechanisms for each data type (gene expression attention, mutation attention, drug structure attention). Each attention mechanism independently processes its corresponding feature type, allowing for modular computation that reduces overall complexity while still achieving comprehensive feature integration for accurate prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240387060A1Drug Sensitivity Prediction and Model Training Method, Storage Medium and Device
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
  • US20240387060A1 patent drawing
  • US20240387060A1 patent drawing
  • US20240387060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting drug sensitivity includes: acquiring gene expression information of a cell line to be tested, gene mutation information of the cell line to be tested, and structural information of a drug to be tested; calculating first correlation information between the structural information of the drug to be tested and the gene expression information based on a first attention model; calculating second correlation information between the structural information of the drug to be tested and the gene mutation information based on a second attention model; splicing the first correlation information and the second correlation information to obtain a splicing result; and performing a prediction processing on the splicing result based on a drug sensitivity prediction model to obtain sensitivity information of the cell line to be tested for the drug to be tested.