User Attention Estimation via Inactivity Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for estimating user attention on websites or applications struggle to accurately distinguish between active and passive presence, which is crucial for understanding user engagement and optimizing website design and operation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that identifies user activity data, detects inactivity periods, and uses a trained model to predict passive presence based on contextual information and user responses to events such as dimming or confirmation requests, allowing for the estimation of total user attention time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional inactivity detection methods are used to estimate user attention, then the implementation is simple, but the measurement precision is low because they cannot accurately distinguish between active and passive presence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser attention estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments user presence into distinct states (active presence, passive presence, and absence) by analyzing multiple signals including activity data, device orientation, and screen state. This segmentation enables precise measurement of different attention levels rather than treating all non-active periods as equal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary sensors and data sources (accelerometer, gyroscope, screen state detectors) that mediate between raw user behavior and attention estimation. These intermediaries capture subtle cues about user engagement that simple inactivity detection misses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If simple inactivity timing is used to measure user engagement, then the ease of operation is high, but the reliability is low because it cannot distinguish passive from active presence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagement measurement reliabilityVSAvoidimplementation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic classification of user presence by continuously monitoring multiple changing parameters (device orientation, screen state, activity patterns) rather than relying on static inactivity thresholds. This dynamic approach adapts to different usage scenarios and improves reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for measurement from simple time-based inactivity to multi-dimensional parameters including device orientation angles, screen state transitions, and activity pattern recognition. These parameter changes enable more reliable distinction between passive and active presence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed activity monitoring is implemented to improve measurement precision, then the accuracy of user attention estimation improves, but the loss of time for data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser attention measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata collection and processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of user presence states using readily available sensor data before initiating more intensive monitoring. This preliminary action filters out cases where detailed analysis is unnecessary, reducing overall processing time while maintaining precision for relevant cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial monitoring strategies where full detailed analysis is performed only when needed (e.g., when passive presence is suspected), while using lighter-weight detection methods for routine monitoring. This selective approach balances precision requirements with time constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10404815B2Systems and methods for estimating user attention
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 META PLATFORMS INC
  • US10404815B2 patent drawing
  • US10404815B2 patent drawing
  • US10404815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for estimating user attention on a website or application are provided. First activity data for a first user of a website or an application may be identified. The first activity data may indicate activities of the first user on the website or the application. A first predetermined period of inactivity may be detected in the first activity data. A response triggering event may be initiated after the first predetermined period of inactivity. An indication of a user response to the response triggering event may be monitored for. Whether the first user is passively present on the website or the application may be determined based on the monitoring for the indication of the user response.