Attention Coding for Latent Tensors With Smaller Probability Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D Gaussian splatting techniques face challenges in model size due to the need for a massive number of parameters and data points, leading to high storage requirements, despite achieving high-quality and fast rendering.

Innovation Solution

Replace latent feature vectors with small query vectors and use a scaled-dot-product-attention mechanism with separate sets of key and value vectors to reduce redundancy and model size, while maintaining visual quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional 3D Gaussian splatting with latent feature vectors is used, then visual quality is maintained, but model size becomes excessively large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual qualityVSAvoidmodel size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the redundant latent feature vectors from the 3D Gaussian splatting representation. By identifying that these feature vectors are not essential for visual reconstruction, the patent eliminates them entirely, keeping only the minimal necessary parameters (position, covariance, opacity, and color) that directly contribute to visual quality while dramatically reducing model size by 4×.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy of the traditional Gaussian splatting representation by replacing complex latent feature vectors with direct parameter storage. Instead of storing high-dimensional latent features that require decomposition, the patent stores the actual reconstructed parameters that can be directly used for rendering, achieving both compression and visual fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If more parameters and data points are used in 3D Gaussian splatting, then rendering quality improves, but storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverendering qualityVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts a disposable approach to parameter storage by keeping only the essential, irreducible parameters needed for rendering (position, covariance, opacity, color) and discarding all redundant information. This minimal parameter set acts as a 'cheap' representation that can be easily stored and transmitted while still enabling high-quality rendering when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent fundamentally changes the parameter representation from high-dimensional latent feature vectors to low-dimensional direct rendering parameters. This parameter transformation reduces the dimensionalality from potentially hundreds of features per Gaussian to just 4-5 essential parameters, achieving compression while maintaining the ability to reconstruct high-quality visuals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If latent feature vectors are stored for each Gaussian, then comprehensive information is retained, but redundancy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation retentionVSAvoidredundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the redundant latent feature vectors from the Gaussian representation. By analyzing what information is actually necessary for visual reconstruction, the patent identifies and eliminates the redundant feature vectors, keeping only the essential parameters that directly contribute to rendering quality without duplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of storing comprehensive latent features and decompressing them during rendering, the patent inverts the approach by storing only the final essential parameters directly in their uncompressed, ready-to-use form. This inversion eliminates the need for decomposition operations and removes all redundancy associated with latent feature storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20260039859A1Attention Mechanism for Compressed Multimedia Content Coding
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20260039859A1 patent drawing
  • US20260039859A1 patent drawing
  • US20260039859A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses are described for entropy encoding and decoding of a latent tensor, which includes separating the latent tensor into segments in the spatial dimensions and in the channel dimension, each segment including at least one latent tensor element. An arrangement of the segments is processed by a neural network: the neural network includes at least one attention layer. Based on the processed segment a probability model is obtained for entropy encoding or decoding of a latent tensor element.