Attenuated Duck Enteritis Virus Vector for Safe In Ovo Vaccination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current poultry vaccination strategies using recombinant viruses, such as those based on avipox, herpes, and adenoviruses, are not effective for providing long-lasting immunity and are unsafe for administration to young chickens or in ovo, as they can be lethal and do not persist in chickens, necessitating the development of alternative viral vectors for early-stage vaccination.

Innovation Solution

Development of attenuated Duck Enteritis Virus (DEV) constructs with inactive US4 and US5 genes, which are safe for young chickens and can be administered in ovo, allowing for early protein expression and stable immunity induction without risk of dissemination to non-vaccinated animals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wild-type DEV is administered to young chicken (3 days or less) or in ovo, then viral replication and protein expression occur, but animal mortality increases to 80-100%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotein expression efficiencyVSAvoidanimal mortality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The US4 and US5 genes are extracted (deleted) from the DEV genome to create a safe attenuated virus. This removal eliminates the harmful factors causing high mortality in young chickens while preserving the virus's ability to replicate and express foreign proteins for vaccination purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The natural virulence of DEV, which causes high mortality in young chickens, is converted into a benefit by deliberately inactivating specific genes (US4 and US5) to create an attenuated strain. This attenuated strain is safe for use in young poultry while still capable of inducing strong immune responses and expressing foreign antigens effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If recombinant viruses (avipox, herpes, adenoviruses) are used for vaccination, then immunity is induced, but the viruses do not persist in chickens and provide limited long-term protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunity induction capabilityVSAvoidduration of immunity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The viral vector platform is changed from transient viruses (avipox, herpes, adenoviruses) to a persistent virus (DEV). This parameter change in viral persistence enables long-term immunity duration while maintaining the capability to induce both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses through expression of foreign pathogen antigens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If existing viral vectors are used for in ovo or early-stage vaccination, then vaccination is performed, but the viruses can be lethal to very young animals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaccination accessibility to early-stage animalsVSAvoidlethality to young animals
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful genes (US4 and US5) are extracted from the DEV genome to create an attenuated strain that is safe for in ovo and early-stage chick vaccination. This extraction maintains the virus's ability to infect and express proteins while eliminating the lethality that prevented use in very young animals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If DEV is modified to reduce virulence, then safety improves, but viral growth rate and titer may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevirulence reductionVSAvoidviral growth rate and titer
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Only specific local regions (US4 and US5 genes) of the DEV genome are modified to reduce virulence, while the rest of the viral genome remains intact. This localized modification preserves the overall viral growth rate and replication efficiency while eliminating the harmful effects in young chickens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10821170B2Duck Enteritis Virus and the uses thereof
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 CEVA SANTE ANIMALE SA
  • US10821170B2 patent drawing
  • US10821170B2 patent drawing
  • US10821170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to DEV and the uses thereof. The invention is particularly suited to vaccinate poultry against avian pathogens.