Attenuation Map Generation for MR-PET Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining attenuation maps in MR-PET systems are limited, as they either fail to accurately account for all materials or require time-consuming test measurements, and existing methods are not suitable for complete definition of attenuation maps, especially for bones and local coils.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of multiple data sets to determine attenuation values, weighting these values based on their relevance, and combining them to generate an accurate attenuation map, which can include using different methods for different tissue types and incorporating confidence values to account for method-dependent uncertainties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple data sets are created and combined to determine attenuation values, then the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the attenuation map is improved, but the complexity of the method and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation map accuracyVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attenuation map determination is segmented into multiple data sets, each focusing on specific materials or tissue types. Different evaluation methods are applied to different data sets based on their suitability for specific materials (e.g., one method for bones, another for soft tissue), and the results are combined through weighting. This segmentation allows each method to be optimized for its specific purpose while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different evaluation methods are applied locally to different data sets based on their specific characteristics and the materials they best represent. Each data set is evaluated with the method most appropriate for its content, and local weighting factors are applied to reflect the reliability and relevance of each evaluation result for specific regions or materials in the attenuation map.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If test measurements are performed to determine attenuation values, then the reliability of attenuation data is improved, but the examination time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation data reliabilityVSAvoidexamination time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Attenuation maps for system components (patient table, local coils, etc.) are determined in advance through test measurements and stored in a database. During the actual PET examination, these pre-determined attenuation maps are retrieved and combined with patient-specific data without requiring additional test measurement time. This preliminary action separates the time-consuming calibration work from the clinical examination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing physical test measurements during each PET examination, the attenuation characteristics of system components are copied into digital attenuation maps that are stored and reused. These digital copies allow rapid retrieval and combination with patient data, eliminating the need for repeated physical measurements while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of information

If attenuation values for all materials are included in the attenuation map, then the completeness of the attenuation correction is improved, but the difficulty of determining and collecting attenuation values increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation correction completenessVSAvoidattenuation value determination difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The determination of attenuation values is segmented by material type and data set. Different evaluation methods are selected and applied based on the specific material being evaluated (e.g., bones, soft tissue, system components). This segmentation makes the complex task manageable by breaking it down into smaller, method-specific sub-tasks that can be handled independently and then combined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a universal framework that can handle multiple material types and evaluation methods through a common data structure and combination process. The weighting mechanism provides a universal approach to integrating results from different evaluation methods, allowing the system to accommodate various materials and methods without requiring separate processing pipelines for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8594960B2Method for determining an attenuation map
Publication Date: 2013.11.26 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US8594960B2 patent drawing
  • US8594960B2 patent drawing
  • US8594960B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for defining an attenuation map. In at least one embodiment, the method includes creating at least two data sets from which attenuation values are able to be determined; evaluating the data sets and determining attenuation values; weighting the attenuation values determined and creating the attenuation map by inserting the weighted attenuation values.