Attitude Differentiation in Enhanced Vision Cockpit Displays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern avionics systems face challenges in intuitively and quickly conveying the relative altitude and attitude of features in real-time images captured by onboard imaging devices without distracting pilots, especially in low-visibility conditions, due to limitations in synthetic terrain display integrity and the need for seamless integration with synthetic vision systems.

Innovation Solution

The system visually partitions real-time images using distinguishable characteristics such as colors or transparency levels, dynamically chosen based on flight phase, image quality, and user preferences, to overlay captured images onto synthetic perspective views, allowing pilots to intuitively identify altitude and attitude while maintaining situational awareness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If real-time images are overlaid on synthetic terrain displays without visual partitioning, then the information density is high, but the pilot cannot quickly determine relative altitude and attitude

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealtitude and attitude determination accuracyVSAvoidtime to process visual information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The captured image is divided into multiple portions based on attitude reference and altitude reference. The portion below attitude reference and below altitude reference is displayed with first visual characteristics, while other portions use different visual characteristics. This segmentation allows pilots to quickly identify relative altitude and attitude without processing the entire image, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If enhanced vision systems provide detailed terrain imagery, then terrain awareness is improved, but situational awareness may be distracted or overwhelmed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain awareness accuracyVSAvoidsituational awareness clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the captured image are displayed with different visual characteristics based on their spatial relationship to attitude and altitude references. This local differentiation provides detailed terrain information where needed while maintaining overall situational awareness, preventing information overload while preserving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If synthetic terrain display is used, then a forward-looking cockpit viewpoint is provided, but the integrity is limited by pre-stored database accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecockpit viewpoint intuitivenessVSAvoidterrain display integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges synthetic terrain display with captured real-time images. The synthetic terrain provides the intuitive forward-looking cockpit viewpoint while the captured images augment it with actual terrain features not in the database, combining the advantages of both systems to achieve both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2413101B1Method and system for attitude differentiation in enhanced vision images of an aircraft cockpit display
Publication Date: 2019.03.13 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP2413101B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2413101B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2413101B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for displaying information on a flight deck display (200) onboard an aircraft (130). An exemplary method comprises obtaining image data (206) for an imaging region and displaying, on the display device (102), a graphical representation of a first portion (208) of the image data (206) using a first visually distinguishable characteristic and a graphical representation of a second portion (210) of the image data (206) using a second visually distinguishable characteristic. The first portion (208) corresponds to a portion of the image data (206) above an attitude reference and the second portion (210) corresponds to a portion of the image data (206) below the attitude reference, and the first visually distinguishable characteristic and the second visually distinguishable characteristic are different.