Automated Attribute Selection for User Entitlement Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managers face challenges in manually reviewing and understanding the risks associated with user authorizations and entitlements in enterprise systems, especially as the number of applications and user entitlements grows, leading to potential inappropriate approvals.

Innovation Solution

An automated method is implemented to select user attributes using predefined information content rules, such as entropy, unique values, distribution, and cross-correlation tests, to identify anomalies in user application entitlements, providing context for informed decision-making during attestation reviews.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review of user entitlements is performed, then understanding of potential risks is improved, but time consumption and operational burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk understandingVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces automated attribute selection and anomaly detection as intermediary components between the manual review process and the entitlement data. These components process and analyze entitlement information automatically, generating insights and flags that assist managers in their review decisions without requiring them to manually examine all entitlement details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically selecting relevant user attributes and identifying potential anomalies in entitlement data. The automated attribute selection process independently determines which attributes are most relevant for anomaly detection, and the system automatically generates review priorities and risk assessments without requiring manual intervention for each analysis step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of applications and user entitlements increases, then system functionality is improved, but complexity of manual review increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidreview complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates the most relevant attributes for anomaly detection from the comprehensive set of user attributes. By automatically selecting and extracting only the critical attributes needed for entitlement analysis, the system reduces the complexity of review while maintaining the ability to handle diverse application scenarios and user roles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the entitlement review process into distinct phases: automated attribute selection, anomaly detection, and manager review of flagged items. This segmentation allows the system to handle large numbers of applications and entitlements by processing them in manageable chunks through automated analysis, reducing the cognitive load and complexity for manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated attribute selection is implemented, then review efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of attribute selection from manual to automated based on statistical criteria. The automated attribute selection process uses configurable parameters such as information content thresholds and correlation coefficients to automatically determine which attributes are most relevant for anomaly detection, improving review efficiency while keeping the system complexity manageable through parameter-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11233796B2Data-driven attribute selection for user application entitlement analysis
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US11233796B2 patent drawing
  • US11233796B2 patent drawing
  • US11233796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for selecting attributes to cluster users for a user application entitlement evaluation. An exemplary method comprises obtaining enterprise reference data indicating a plurality of attributes for a plurality of enterprise users; obtaining enterprise entitlement data indicating user application entitlements for the plurality of enterprise users; selecting at least one of the plurality of attributes as a cluster attribute using predefined information content rules applied on the enterprise entitlement data; determining a probability of a user application entitlement for the one or more user application entitlements based on a number of users for a plurality of values of the cluster attribute and a number of users for a plurality of pairs of the cluster attribute and a value of the one or more user application entitlements; and identifying anomalies in the enterprise entitlement data based on the probability of the user application entitlement for at least one user application entitlement and at least one predefined anomaly threshold.