ATV Steering Mechanism Forward of Axial Centerline

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) lack optimal ergonomics and protective features for operators, particularly in terms of seating and roll cage design, which can compromise comfort and safety during use.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a structurally rigid frame with a bucket seat aligned with the longitudinal centerline, a protective canopy extending beyond the wheels, and a steering mechanism positioned forward of the axial centerline, along with a roll cage structure that provides enhanced protection and ergonomic operator compartment features such as a walk-through opening and adjustable steering options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a roll cage structure is added to the ATV, then operator safety and protection are improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roll cage structure is integrated with the vehicle frame by coupling it to the front frame portion and longitudinally extending frame members, merging the protective function with the structural framework to reduce overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The roll cage serves multiple functions: it provides operator protection during rollovers, structures the operator compartment, and integrates with the suspension mounting system, allowing one structure to fulfill multiple roles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the steering mechanism is positioned forward of the axial centerline of the front wheels, then steering response and maneuverability are improved, but structural stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering responsivenessVSAvoidfront suspension stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The steering mechanism is deliberately positioned asymmetrically forward of the wheel axial centerline, creating unequal moment arms that enhance steering responsiveness while the lower alignment arms provide counterbalancing geometric constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The problem is solved by adding vertical dimension considerations through the lower alignment arms that connect to the front frame portion above, creating a three-dimensional geometric constraint system that stabilizes the otherwise unstable forward steering position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the protective canopy extends laterally beyond the inside edge of the wheels, then operator protection from external elements is improved, but device complexity and width increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from external elementsVSAvoidcanopy structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective canopy provides extended lateral coverage specifically over the operator compartment where protection is most needed, while maintaining a more compact profile over other vehicle sections, optimizing protection where it matters most

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If the front frame portion extends beyond the longitudinally extending frame members to define mounting extensions, then adaptability for suspension components is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension mounting flexibilityVSAvoidframe manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The front frame portion is segmented from the main longitudinally extending frame members, allowing independent fabrication and assembly of the front suspension mounting section, which simplifies manufacturing by enabling modular production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The front frame portion serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, defines the operator compartment front boundary, and creates mounting extensions for suspension components, allowing one piece to fulfill multiple roles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10160497B2All terrain vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 POLARIS IND INC
  • US10160497B2 patent drawing
  • US10160497B2 patent drawing
  • US10160497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ATV is disclosed having a frame, a seat supported by the frame, front and rear wheels supporting the frame, a drivetrain supported by the frame, and an operator's compartment extending generally between the seat and a front enclosure. The front enclosure extends forwardly to a position proximate an axial centerline of the front wheels. Front lower alignment arms have an inner end and an outer end. Front struts have a shock absorber and a hub portion, where the front struts are coupled to the front lower alignment arms at a lower end of the front struts and the frame at an upper end. A steering mechanism is positioned forward of the axial centerline of the front wheels and is coupled to the front struts.