Auction Transaction Server with Intermediary Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internet-based auction systems face scalability issues and inefficiencies due to bandwidth limitations and packet loss, leading to delayed or lost bids, which can result in lost sales and diminished profits, especially during peak loads, and do not effectively manage the dynamic nature of market pricing and bidder participation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a robust auction system with real-time bid processing and error-free communication protocols, utilizing secure networks and cryptographic technologies to ensure reliable data transmission and secure transactions, while also incorporating advanced user interfaces for efficient bidder management and dynamic pricing mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If Internet-based auction systems are used to enable market transactions, then accessibility and connectivity are improved, but reliability and efficiency deteriorate due to bandwidth limitations and packet loss

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidbid transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a transaction server as an intermediary between bidders and the auction system. This server receives bids from multiple bidders, validates them, and processes transactions centrally. The intermediary architecture isolates the auction logic from network vulnerabilities, ensuring that even if packets are lost or delayed, the central server maintains accurate bid records and transaction states, thereby improving reliability while preserving Internet-based accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation and processing of bids before final transaction completion. Bids are pre-validated for format and authenticity, and the system pre-processes transaction logic before committing results. This preliminary action ensures that even if network transmission experiences packet loss or delays, the core transaction data has already been processed and validated, preventing bid errors and maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If robust error detection and retransmission protocols are implemented, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to retransmission requests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of bid data at the source before transmission, checking for format errors and authenticity. This pre-validation reduces the likelihood of erroneous packets requiring retransmission. Additionally, the transaction server maintains pre-computed validation rules and bid state information, enabling rapid verification without time-consuming retransmission cycles, thus improving reliability while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements efficient feedback mechanisms where the transaction server immediately confirms bid receipt and validation status to bidders. This real-time feedback eliminates the need for prolonged waiting periods and retransmission requests, as bidders receive instant confirmation that their bids were successfully received and processed, maintaining both reliability and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If centralized transaction processing is used, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction consistencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transaction server is designed as a universal platform that handles multiple auction types, bid formats, and transaction scenarios through a single centralized system. Rather than creating separate complex systems for different functions, the universal server consolidates validation, processing, and management capabilities into one multi-functional architecture, improving transaction consistency while actually reducing overall system complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses homogeneous data structures and standardized bid formats across all transactions. By enforcing uniform bid schemas, validation rules, and transaction protocols, the centralized server processes all bids through the same reliable pathway, simplifying the architecture while ensuring transaction consistency. This homogeneity eliminates the need for complex conditional processing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Productivity

If real-time bid processing is implemented, then efficiency is improved, but bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebid processing speedVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential bid data elements (bidder ID, bid amount, timestamp) for real-time transmission to the transaction server, while storing detailed bid records and metadata locally or in secondary storage. This extraction approach enables rapid real-time processing of critical information over the network while minimizing bandwidth consumption by transmitting only necessary data points rather than complete bid records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The transaction server maintains local copies of bid validation rules, auction parameters, and bidder profiles, eliminating the need for repeated network requests to retrieve this information during bid processing. By caching frequently accessed data locally, the system achieves real-time processing speed without the overhead of continuous network bandwidth consumption for data retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10163137B2System and method for incentivizing participation in a market transaction
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 HOFFBERG FAMILY TRUST 2
  • US10163137B2 patent drawing
  • US10163137B2 patent drawing
  • US10163137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method providing for communication and resolution of utility functions between participants, wherein the utility function is evaluated based on local information at the recipient to determine a cost value thereof. A user interface having express representation of both information elements, and associated reliability of the information. An automated system for optimally conveying information based on relevance and reliability.