Signal Processing System for Reliable Audible Alarm Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smoke and carbon monoxide detectors often produce audible alert signals that are ineffective in alerting individuals with hearing loss, older adults, children, and intoxicated persons, due to signal drift from regulations, background noise interference, and varying signal intensity, leading to potential safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A signal processing system that detects audible alert signals from smoke and carbon monoxide detectors using digital templates to match audio patterns, generates supplemental alerts, and can operate in the presence of background noise, ensuring high sensitivity and specificity to minimize false negatives and false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional pure tone alarm signals (3100-3200 Hz) are used, then the alarm meets regulatory specifications, but the alarm is ineffective for individuals with hearing loss, older adults, children, and intoxicated persons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm effectivenessVSAvoidsignal adaptability to different hearing capabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the frequency parameter of the alarm signal from traditional 3100-3200 Hz pure tones to lower frequencies (e.g., 520 Hz square wave patterns) that are more effective for alerting individuals with hearing loss, older adults, children, and intoxicated persons while maintaining regulatory compliance through supplemental alerting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the detection device uses high sensitivity to detect weak alarm signals, then detection capability improves, but false positive detections increase due to background noise interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning during a quiet period before alarm detection to establish a baseline noise profile of the environment. This pre-acquired noise characterization is then used to differentiate actual alarm signals from background noise, enabling high sensitivity detection without increasing false positives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the audio environment and compares detected signals against the learned noise profile, using feedback mechanisms to adjust detection thresholds and distinguish between background noise variations and actual alarm signals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Area of stationary object

If the detection device is placed far from the alarm source to provide coverage area, then coverage is improved, but the alarm signal intensity weakens by the time it reaches the detection device

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverage areaVSAvoidsignal intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects periodic alarm signal patterns (such as the characteristic 3-beep or 4-beep sequences of smoke and CO detectors) even when the signals are weak due to distance. By recognizing the temporal pattern rather than relying solely on signal strength, the system maintains detection capability across larger coverage areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If the system uses multiple templates to cover variations in alarm signals, then detection robustness improves, but the complexity of the detection algorithm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection robustnessVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a limited set of templates covering the most common alarm signal variations (smoke detector patterns, CO detector patterns, and noise profiles) rather than attempting to cover every possible variation. This partial approach maintains robustness for typical scenarios while keeping computational complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8269625B2Signal processing system and methods for reliably detecting audible alarms
Publication Date: 2012.09.18 INNOVALARM
  • US8269625B2 patent drawing
  • US8269625B2 patent drawing
  • US8269625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A signal processing system and associated methods are disclosed for reliably detecting audible alert signals, such as Temporal-3 (or Code-3) and Temporal-4 (or Code-4) alert signals generated by commercially available smoke, fire, and carbon monoxide detectors. The system and methods are capable of detecting audible alert signals of different intensities in the presence of dynamic background environment (e.g., television programming, music, noise, and the like). The system and methods are capable of detecting audible alert signals generated by far away smoke, fire, and carbon monoxide detectors. The signal processing system and methods may, in some embodiments, be incorporated into a bedside or other unit that generates a supplemental alert signal capable of alerting individuals who might not otherwise respond to the alarm condition, such as individuals who are asleep, children, hearing impaired, or intoxicated.