Audible Order Alerts With Adaptive Speaker Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In noisy and complex environments like restaurants, visual alerts on user devices may be ineffective, necessitating the use of audible alerts to ensure timely user responses to trigger events, and existing systems lack efficient methods for selecting and customizing these alerts.

Innovation Solution

A user interface is generated to customize audible alerts, selecting event types, sounds, and preferences, with machine learning models determining when and how to output alerts, prioritizing them, and choosing speakers for optimal delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If visual alerts are used on user devices, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of alert delivery deteriorates in noisy environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert system complexityVSAvoidalert delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an environmental assessment intermediary that evaluates noise levels and user context before selecting alert modality. This intermediary layer processes sensor data and determines whether visual or audible alerts should be used, resolving the contradiction by adapting to environmental conditions rather than using a fixed approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between visual and audible alert modalities based on real-time environmental assessment. The alert delivery mechanism is made adaptive rather than static, allowing the system to optimize reliability for each specific context while managing overall complexity through standardized switching logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If audible alerts are selected and customized, then the user response effectiveness is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser response effectivenessVSAvoidalert selection and customization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-assessment of environmental conditions and automatically selects appropriate alert modalities and characteristics. Rather than requiring manual user configuration, the system autonomously adapts alert delivery based on sensor data and contextual information, improving effectiveness while avoiding the complexity of manual customization interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where user responses to alerts are monitored and used to refine future alert selection. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past interactions and improve user response effectiveness over time without increasing structural complexity, as the learning is handled through software algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple speakers are utilized for alert output, then the coverage and reliability are improved, but the loss of time for speaker selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert output coverageVSAvoidspeaker selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies and ranks available speakers based on environmental assessment and historical performance data before an alert needs to be delivered. This preliminary preparation creates a ready-to-use speaker selection list, allowing rapid deployment of multi-speaker alert output without time-consuming selection delays when alerts are actually needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple speaker outputs simultaneously for critical alerts, merging their capabilities to achieve broader coverage and higher reliability. By pre-coordinating multi-speaker operation and using standardized output protocols, the system achieves enhanced coverage without proportionally increasing selection time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12548416B1Audio data processing and output improvement
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 BLOCK INC
  • US12548416B1 patent drawing
  • US12548416B1 patent drawing
  • US12548416B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques described herein are directed to, among other things, determining a status change of a data object representing an order and determining attributes of the order. The systems described herein may then determine to provide an audible alert about the order based at least in part on the status change and the attributes of the order. Predefined audio data associated with the status change of the order may be identified and utilized to cause output, on a speaker of a device associated with the data object, of the audible alert about the order.