Audio Access Gating for Third-Party Assistant Applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated assistants provide unfettered access to audio data content, which can waste bandwidth and network resources, pose security risks, and compromise user privacy when applications improperly request access to audio data that is not necessary for the dialog.

Innovation Solution

Implement a machine learning model to determine the propriety of providing audio data content to applications based on the content generated during a dialog turn, using training instances to assess whether the application should receive subsequent audio data, and restrict access when the request is improper.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If applications are granted unfettered access to audio data content, then application functionality and user interaction are improved, but network bandwidth and computing resources are wasted, and user privacy and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication functionalityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth and computing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the application's request context before granting access to audio data. The automated assistant evaluates whether the audio data is necessary for the dialog turn based on the application's request and the conversational context, preventing unnecessary data transmission before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated assistant acts as an intermediary between the application and the audio data content. It receives requests from applications, evaluates their validity based on dialog context, and selectively provides or withholds audio data content, thereby controlling resource usage and protecting user privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If applications are granted unfettered access to audio data content, then application functionality is improved, but user privacy and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication functionalityVSAvoiduser privacy and security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of application requests before audio data is transmitted. The automated assistant assesses whether the request is proper based on the dialog context and application behavior, preventing unauthorized or unnecessary access to sensitive audio content before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated assistant serves as a protective intermediary that stands between the application and user audio data. It evaluates request propriety and selectively blocks or permits access, thereby protecting user privacy and security while still enabling legitimate application functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If all audio data content is transmitted to applications, then complete information availability is achieved, but unnecessary processing and resource consumption occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availability to applicationVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transmits only the specific audio data content that is necessary for the current dialog turn, rather than transmitting all audio data. The automated assistant identifies and provides only the relevant portion of audio content that the application needs to function properly in the context of the ongoing conversation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by providing only the necessary subset of audio data content rather than all available data. This selective provision of information maintains sufficient functionality for the application while avoiding the excessive processing and resource consumption that would result from transmitting complete audio datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12567409B2Restricting third party application access to audio data content
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12567409B2 patent drawing
  • US12567409B2 patent drawing
  • US12567409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations relate to restricting access of an application to audio data content captured subsequent to rendering content to the user at the request of the application. An application can generate content that is to be rendered to a user with an additional request to receive audio data content from audio data captured immediately after rendering the content. The content can be processed, using a trained machine learning model that generates, as output, an indication of likelihood that providing audio data content after rendering the content from the application was improper. In instances the application improperly requested audio data content, the application can be restricted from being provided the audio data content and/or subsequent audio data content.