Audio Analysis Agent for Speech Confliction in High Latency Sessions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collaboration services do not effectively manage speech confliction in high latency networks, leading to awkward situations where users often speak simultaneously due to delayed audio transmission.

Innovation Solution

A computing system with audio analysis agents in client devices determines network latency and generates an indicator command to display the speaking status of users, preventing speech confliction by showing indicators such as red for speaking, yellow for pause, and green for silence, allowing other users to know when to speak safely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If audio transmission occurs in real-time during collaboration sessions, then communication responsiveness is improved, but speech confliction increases due to high network latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio transmission speedVSAvoidspeech confliction
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting when a user is speaking and proactively displaying an indicator before the audio transmission completes. This allows other users to know in advance when they should wait, preventing speech confliction while maintaining real-time communication flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring audio input, determining speaking status, and providing visual feedback through indicators displayed to other users. This feedback loop enables users to adjust their speaking timing based on real-time information about when others are talking, eliminating speech overlap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If network latency is high, then communication reliability is maintained, but speech confliction increases due to delayed audio transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidspeech confliction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism - the visual indicator - that mediates between the high latency condition and the need for clear communication. The indicator translates the abstract latency problem into concrete visual information, allowing users to coordinate speaking turns without requiring immediate audio feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If audio analysis is performed continuously to detect speaking status, then speech confliction is prevented, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech conflictionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by having each client device's audio analysis agent automatically detect speaking status and generate indicator commands without requiring central coordination or complex external systems. The agents operate independently, analyzing local audio and autonomously managing the indicator display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240007512A1Indicator for avoiding speech confliction in a communications session when network latency is high
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 CITRIX SYSTEMS INC
  • US20240007512A1 patent drawing
  • US20240007512A1 patent drawing
  • US20240007512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system includes first and second client computing devices accessing a communications network to establish a communications session. The first client computing device operates an audio analysis agent to determine network latency within the communications session based on communications with an audio analysis agent in the second client computing device. In response to the network latency exceeding a latency threshold, audio input from a user of the first client computing device is analyzed to determine a speaking status of the user. The audio analysis agent generates an indicator command message for the second client computing device based on the determined speaking status of the user. The second client computing device displays an indicator based on the indicator command message indicating when a user of the second client computing device can speak to avoid speech confliction with the user of said first client computing device.