Three-Stage Audio Analysis Filtering Low-Quality Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Audio analysis engines in environments like call centers and financial institutions face challenges in accuracy and efficiency due to the quality and integrity of captured audio signals, leading to suboptimal performance and high false alarm rates.

Innovation Solution

A three-stage audio analysis process involving a pre-analysis stage to filter low-quality interactions, a main analysis stage for accurate classification, and a post-analysis stage for result verification and modification, utilizing a quality evaluator and rule engine to determine the suitability of audio segments for processing and adjust thresholds based on environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If audio analysis engine processes all captured audio interactions, then completeness of analysis is improved, but accuracy decreases due to low-quality signals and false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of audio analysis resultsVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment of audio interactions before they are processed by the audio analysis engine. By evaluating signal quality metrics in advance, the system identifies and filters out low-quality audio segments that would likely produce inaccurate results or false alarms, thereby improving the overall accuracy and reliability of the analysis process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing strategies to different audio interactions based on their individual quality characteristics. High-quality audio segments are processed with full analysis, while low-quality segments are filtered out or processed with adjusted parameters. This localized quality-based approach ensures that only suitable audio interactions contribute to accurate analysis results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If audio analysis engine processes all captured audio interactions, then coverage is improved, but productivity decreases due to computational overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of audio analysis coverageVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes low-quality audio interactions from the processing queue before they reach the computationally intensive audio analysis engine. By taking out unsuitable audio segments in advance, the system reduces the workload on the analysis engine and improves processing efficiency without sacrificing the analysis of valuable high-quality audio data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and quality assessment before the main analysis process. This preliminary action separates suitable audio interactions from unsuitable ones, allowing the audio analysis engine to focus only on quality segments that warrant computational resources, thereby improving overall processing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If audio analysis engine operates with fixed processing criteria, then simplicity is improved, but adaptability decreases to environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of processing criteriaVSAvoidadaptability to environmental demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts processing criteria and thresholds based on environmental conditions and audio quality assessments. Instead of using fixed parameters, the system adapts its processing behavior to match the characteristics of each audio interaction and the current operational environment, improving versatility while maintaining manageable complexity through rule-based adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes processing parameters such as quality thresholds, analysis depth, and filtering criteria based on environmental conditions and audio signal characteristics. This parameter adaptation allows the system to respond to different operational contexts and audio qualities without requiring completely different processing pipelines, balancing adaptability with implementation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8005675B2Apparatus and method for audio analysis
Publication Date: 2011.08.23 NICE LTD
  • US8005675B2 patent drawing
  • US8005675B2 patent drawing
  • US8005675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for an improved audio analysis process is disclosed. The improvement concerns the accuracy level of the results and the rate of false alarms produced by the audio analysis process. The proposed apparatus and method provides a three-stage audio analysis route. The three-stage analysis process includes a pre-analysis stage, a main analysis stage and a post analysis stage.