Adaptive Audio Coding Control for Error Resilience Trade-Offs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio coding systems face challenges in dynamically adapting to varying performance goals and environmental changes, such as fluctuating bit rates and computational complexity, due to the complexity of configuring multiple coding tools and their interactions with different hardware platforms and transmission channels.

Innovation Solution

A controller is introduced that uses machine-learning algorithms, specifically reinforcement learning and fuzzy logic, to adaptively select and configure audio coding tools based on real-time performance data, optimizing error resilience and other performance measures without prior knowledge of the system or tools, enabling dynamic adjustments in response to changing conditions like low power states or transmission channel demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple coding tools are selected and configured to achieve different performance levels, then performance measures such as quality, bit rate, and error resilience are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of control increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror resilienceVSAvoidcoding tool configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is divided into multiple specialized agents (coding tool agents, error management agents, error resilience agents) that each handle specific aspects of the coding configuration. This segmentation allows complex multi-dimensional optimization to be broken down into manageable specialized tasks, improving error resilience without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors performance parameters and feeds this information back to the agents, which dynamically adjust coding tool selections and configurations. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing conditions and optimize error resilience automatically without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If coding apparatus is adapted to different system and hardware platforms, then versatility and adaptability are improved, but characterization and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform compatibilityVSAvoidalgorithm characterization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The agents are designed with universal interfaces that allow them to operate across different hardware platforms and system configurations. The error management agents and coding tool agents can universally evaluate performance parameters and adjust configurations regardless of the underlying platform, providing platform-independent adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-characterization through the agents' evaluation of performance parameters. Rather than requiring external characterization for each platform, the agents automatically assess how the coding apparatus behaves on each platform and adjust accordingly, enabling automatic adaptation without manual characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If performance parameters are dynamically adjusted to meet varying performance goals, then productivity and responsiveness are improved, but control complexity and engineering effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pre-configured coding parameters to dynamic agent-controlled adjustments. The coding tool agents and error management agents continuously adapt performance parameters based on real-time feedback, enabling rapid responsiveness to changing requirements without fixed configuration constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The agents are pre-equipped with knowledge of coding tool characteristics and performance trade-offs. This preliminary preparation allows them to quickly evaluate performance parameters and make informed configuration decisions without extensive real-time computation, improving productivity while managing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8793557B2Method and apparatus for real-time multidimensional adaptation of an audio coding system
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 QUALCOMM TECH INT
  • US8793557B2 patent drawing
  • US8793557B2 patent drawing
  • US8793557B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adaptive controller for a configurable audio coding system including a fuzzy logic controller modified to use reinforcement learning to create an intelligent control system. With no knowledge of the external system into which it is placed the audio coding system, under the control of the adaptive controller, is capable of adapting its coding configuration to achieve user set performance goals.