Audio Control Robotics for Dense Sampling of Amplifier Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems face challenges in determining the responsive behavior of audio systems across a range of settings due to the need for numerous measurements, which results in excessive mechanical wear and time consumption, especially when dealing with audio systems having multiple controls with various settings.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system that includes a device interface coupled with a control sequencer, which generates control sequences to automatically adjust settings on audio systems, using a sufficiently dense random sampling process to reduce the number of measurements required, thereby minimizing wear and time, while capturing the responsive behavior across different settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a sufficiently high number of measurements are taken to accurately determine responsive behavior across all control settings, then measurement precision is improved, but mechanical wear and time consumption increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of responsive behavior determinationVSAvoidtime consumption for measurements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by taking a subset of measurements rather than exhaustively measuring all possible control settings. The system selectively samples specific combinations of control settings based on their importance and interaction effects, achieving sufficient measurement precision without the need to measure every possible setting combination. This reduces the total number of measurements while maintaining adequate accuracy for determining responsive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the measurement process by dividing control settings into different categories (individual controls, pairwise interactions, higher-order interactions) and measuring them in hierarchical order. This segmentation allows the system to focus measurements on the most significant factors first, reducing overall measurement requirements while maintaining precision for the dominant behavior characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If a sufficiently high number of measurements are taken to accurately determine responsive behavior across all control settings, then measurement precision is improved, but mechanical wear increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of responsive behavior determinationVSAvoidmechanical wear on controls
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by taking a subset of measurements rather than exhaustively measuring all possible control settings. The system selectively samples specific combinations of control settings based on their importance and interaction effects, achieving sufficient measurement precision without the need to measure every possible setting combination. This reduces the total number of measurements while maintaining adequate accuracy for determining responsive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the measurement process by dividing control settings into different categories (individual controls, pairwise interactions, higher-order interactions) and measuring them in hierarchical order. This segmentation allows the system to focus measurements on the most significant factors first, reducing overall measurement requirements while maintaining precision for the dominant behavior characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If all control settings are measured exhaustively to capture complete responsive behavior, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and time requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of responsive behavior characterizationVSAvoidcomplexity of measurement system and process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by taking a subset of measurements rather than exhaustively measuring all possible control settings. The system selectively samples specific combinations of control settings based on their importance and interaction effects, achieving sufficient measurement precision without the need to measure every possible setting combination. This reduces the total number of measurements while maintaining adequate accuracy for determining responsive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the measurement process by dividing control settings into different categories (individual controls, pairwise interactions, higher-order interactions) and measuring them in hierarchical order. This segmentation allows the system to focus measurements on the most significant factors first, reducing overall measurement requirements while maintaining precision for the dominant behavior characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12014108B2Robotic system for controlling audio systems
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 NEURAL DSP TECH OY
  • US12014108B2 patent drawing
  • US12014108B2 patent drawing
  • US12014108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic system is provided, which automatically changes settings on an audio system. The audio system (e.g., an instrument amplifier, effect processor, etc.) typically includes one or more controls that impact the operation of the audio system. Correspondingly, the robotic system includes a device interface coupled to a control sequencer. The device interface adapts to one or more controls of the audio system that are to be changed. In this regard, the device interface includes one or more control couplers. Each control coupler is adapted to a corresponding control of the audio system to be changed. The control sequencer provides a control sequence to the device interface that causes the control coupler(s) to vary the settings on the audio system. In practical applications, a combination of sequence values of the control sequence can represent a sufficiently high number of samples to determine a responsive behavior of the audio system.