Audio Crossover Response Shaping for Midrange Distortion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional audio crossover designs fail to account for human hearing sensitivity, leading to increased audible distortion and coloration in the midrange frequency area, resulting in suboptimal sound reproduction and listener fatigue.

Innovation Solution

The audio crossover system employs an inversely proportional frequency response design, using a true first-order crossover with separate corner frequencies for each driver to minimize distortion and maximize amplifier control, allowing drivers to operate within their pistonic range and reducing mechanical breakup, thereby achieving a more natural and dynamic sound reproduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional flat frequency response crossover design is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but audible distortion increases in the midrange area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrossover design simplicityVSAvoidaudible distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the frequency response parameters from a traditional flat response to an inversely proportional response that dips in the 2-6 kHz midrange area. This parameter change reduces audible distortion by counteracting human hearing sensitivity peaks in this frequency range, while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standard crossover components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional flat frequency response design is used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but signal coloration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidsignal coloration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The invention modifies the frequency response parameter profile to create an inversely proportional curve with a dip in the midrange area. This change reduces signal coloration caused by driver interaction while keeping manufacturing costs low by using standard crossover components and avoiding exotic materials or complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If traditional crossover design is used, then device complexity is minimized, but dynamic range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrossover system complexityVSAvoiddynamic range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes to the frequency response characteristics, creating an inversely proportional response that extends the effective dynamic range. This is achieved through optimized corner frequency selection and Q-factor adjustment rather than adding complex active components, thereby maintaining device simplicity while expanding dynamic range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Power

If traditional flat response crossover is used, then amplifier control is reduced, but system artifact generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplifier controlVSAvoidsystem artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the crossover parameter profile to an inversely proportional response with strategic dip placement. This parameter optimization improves amplifier control over the drivers by reducing feedback and interaction problems in the midrange, thereby reducing system artifacts like distortion and coloration without requiring more complex amplifier design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8194886B2Audio crossover system and method
Publication Date: 2012.06.05 KNIGHT IAN HOWA
  • US8194886B2 patent drawing
  • US8194886B2 patent drawing
  • US8194886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An audio crossover system and method is disclosed. An audio system includes two driver circuits, one for each of two audio frequency ranges, e.g., high and low frequency ranges. The driver circuits are designed to provide a combined frequency response curve that has a pronounced midrange attenuation dip, in contrast to prior art designs that attempt to provide a flat response over all frequency ranges.