Audio Component Recalibration Using Degradation Model Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Audio components in computing devices, such as speakers and microphones, degrade over time due to wear and physical damage, leading to reduced audio quality and operational lifespan, as existing technologies lack effective methods for recalibration and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A degradation model is implemented to monitor and adjust attributes like gain and frequency of audio components using a digital signal processor and audio amplifier, comparing characteristics to a stored model to enhance sound quality and extend the life of the components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If audio components are used continuously over time, then productivity and usage duration are improved, but reliability deteriorates due to wear and physical damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational lifespanVSAvoidaudio quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration and establishes a degradation model when the audio component is new. This model predicts future degradation patterns, allowing the system to proactively adjust attributes before significant performance loss occurs, thereby extending operational lifespan while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors audio component characteristics and compares them against the stored degradation model. This feedback loop enables real-time detection of degradation patterns and triggers automatic attribute adjustments to compensate for wear, maintaining audio quality throughout the component's operational life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If audio component attributes are adjusted to compensate for degradation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio performance consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors audio component degradation and adjusts attributes without requiring external intervention. The digital signal processor independently compares characteristics against the degradation model and performs recalibration, eliminating the need for manual maintenance while ensuring consistent audio performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts audio component operating parameters such as gain, frequency, or power levels based on the degradation model. By dynamically changing these parameters in response to detected wear patterns, the system maintains optimal performance without adding physical components or increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11026033B2Audio component adjusting
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11026033B2 patent drawing
  • US11026033B2 patent drawing
  • US11026033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples associated with audio component adjusting are described. One example includes storing a degradation for an audio component embedded in a device. A characteristic of the audio component is compared to the degradation model for the audio component. When the characteristic of the audio component indicates the audio component has reached a certain point on the degradation model, an attribute of the audio component is adjusted.