Audio Dub Validation via Cross-Correlation and Spectral Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for validating alternate language dubs in media programs are time-consuming and labor-intensive, requiring manual search for segments containing dubbed audio, which impedes the processing and distribution of media content.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automate the validation process by comparing primary and alternate audio tracks to locate matching regions, generating a temporal inverse to identify dubbed speech regions, and using voice activity detection to confirm speech presence, thereby reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual search methods are used to locate dubbed speech segments, then validation accuracy can be maintained through human review, but the processing time and labor intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical search and review processes with automated audio signal processing. The system uses digital signal processing techniques including cross-correlation analysis and spectral comparison to automatically identify dubbed speech regions, substituting human manual review with computational algorithms that achieve both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processing steps between the raw audio tracks and final validation. Cross-correlation functions and spectral analysis serve as intermediaries that transform the audio signals into comparable representations, enabling automated identification of dubbed regions without requiring direct human listening and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual validation processes are used, then thorough evaluation of dub quality can be achieved, but productivity and distribution speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedub validation qualityVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the audio validation process into distinct segments: cross-correlation analysis to identify matching regions, spectral analysis to detect dubbed speech characteristics, and region-by-region validation. This segmentation allows the system to process audio tracks systematically and efficiently while maintaining comprehensive quality evaluation across all dubbed segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the validation approach by changing parameters from time-domain manual listening to frequency-domain spectral analysis. By analyzing audio signals in the frequency domain using spectral comparison, the system can automatically detect dubbed speech regions with high reliability while processing multiple tracks simultaneously to improve overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If automated comparison methods are implemented to identify dubbed regions, then processing speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal audio processing framework that handles multiple validation tasks through a single integrated system. The same cross-correlation and spectral analysis functions serve multiple purposes: identifying dubbed regions, comparing audio tracks, and validating speech content. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems while maintaining high processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If extensive manual review is performed to ensure dub accuracy, then validation thoroughness is maintained, but labor requirements and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedub accuracy detectionVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the validation system to perform self-service by automatically identifying and flagging dubbed speech regions without requiring manual intervention. The audio processing algorithms autonomously analyze the tracks, compare signals, and generate validation results, eliminating the need for extensive human labor while maintaining accurate detection of dub quality issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution accelerates and partially automates the validation of alternate language dubs, allowing for rapid identification of dubbed speech regions and improving the accuracy and speed of media distribution, reducing the need for extensive human validation.

Implementation Method 1

performing an audio cross-correlation between the first audio track and the alternate audio track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCross-correlation:

Implementation Method 2

comparing audio frequency spectra of the first audio track and the alternate audio track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency spectrum analysis:

Implementation Method 3

analyzing one or more of the regions that contain dubbed speech to detect voice activity and using results of the analysis to determine a start time of speech within the one or more regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoice activity detection:

Data Source

PatentUS10861482B2Foreign language dub validation
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 AVID TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10861482B2 patent drawing
  • US10861482B2 patent drawing
  • US10861482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Temporal regions of a time-based media program that contain spoken dialog in a language that is dubbed from a primary language are identified automatically. A primary language audio track of the media program is compared with an alternate language audio track. Closely similar regions are assumed not to contain dubbed dialog, while the temporal inverse of the similar regions are candidate regions for containing dubbed speech. The candidate regions are provided to a dub validator to facilitate locating each region to be validated without having to play back or search the entire time-based media program. Corresponding regions of the primary and alternate language tracks that are closely similar and that contain voice activity are candidate regions of forced narrative, and the temporal locations of these regions may be used by a validator to facilitate rapid validation of forced narrative in the program.