Audio Gain Smoothing to Reduce Musical Noise Artifacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing noise reduction methods in audio signal processing often produce artifacts such as speech distortion and musical noise due to estimation errors and non-stationarity of noise, leading to spurious peaks in the spectral representation of the signal.

Innovation Solution

The method involves post-processing raw gains determined by input processing using delta gain smoothing and decision-directed gain smoothing techniques to stabilize the gain variations, thereby reducing musical noise artifacts and improving the quality of the output signal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If noise reduction gains are applied to remove undesired signals, then noise suppression is improved, but speech distortion and musical noise artifacts are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppressionVSAvoidmusical noise artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary smoothing action to the gain function before it is applied to the signal. By pre-smoothing the gain in the frequency and time domains, the patent prevents the formation of spurious peaks that would otherwise create musical noise artifacts, while still maintaining effective noise suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by applying smoothing filters to the gain function prior to signal processing. This cushioning effect reduces the impact of estimation errors and prevents abrupt gain variations that would cause musical noise, thereby protecting the output signal from artifacts while preserving noise reduction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If aggressive noise reduction is applied, then noise removal is improved, but speech distortion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise removalVSAvoidspeech distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic smoothing where the smoothing factor is adapted based on the local characteristics of the gain function and signal conditions. This dynamic approach allows aggressive noise reduction where appropriate while maintaining speech quality in regions where distortion would otherwise occur, making the noise reduction process adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by performing smoothing operations with different characteristics in different frequency regions and time frames. By adapting the smoothing parameters locally based on signal conditions, the patent achieves effective noise removal in some regions while preserving speech quality in others, avoiding uniform aggressive processing that would cause widespread distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11694711B2Post-processing gains for signal enhancement
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US11694711B2 patent drawing
  • US11694711B2 patent drawing
  • US11694711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, an apparatus, and logic to post-process raw gains determined by input processing to generate post-processed gains, comprising using one or both of delta gain smoothing and decision-directed gain smoothing. The delta gain smoothing comprises applying a smoothing filter to the raw gain with a smoothing factor that depends on the gain delta: the absolute value of the difference between the raw gain for the current frame and the post-processed gain for a previous frame. The decision-directed gain smoothing comprises converting the raw gain to a signal-to-noise ratio, applying a smoothing filter with a smoothing factor to the signal-to-noise ratio to calculate a smoothed signal-to-noise ratio, and converting the smoothed signal-to-noise ratio to determine the second smoothed gain, with smoothing factor possibly dependent on the gain delta.