Audio Interference Control via Wireless Message Exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling audio service interference, such as noise cancellation and automatic volume adjustment, are inefficient and costly, often requiring additional devices or increasing terminal power consumption, leading to reduced noise reduction effectiveness and shorter terminal lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A method using short-range wireless communication technologies like Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or infrared to send interference control messages between terminals, allowing one terminal to adjust its settings to reduce noise interference without the need for additional devices, thereby conserving power and improving user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If noise cancellation method is used, then noise reduction effect is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional noise reduction device

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise interferenceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a message as an intermediary carrier to transmit interference control parameters between terminals. Instead of direct noise cancellation hardware, the first terminal sends a message containing interference control parameters to the second terminal, which then adjusts its output accordingly. This message-based intermediary approach achieves noise reduction without adding complex cancellation devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/acoustic noise cancellation system with an information-based control system. Rather than using acoustic waves to cancel noise physically, the system uses electronic messages to convey interference control parameters, which then trigger software-based or settings-based noise control on the second terminal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If automatic volume adjustment method is used, then noise resistance is improved, but power consumption increases and terminal lifespan decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise interferenceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and transmitting interference control parameters before the audio service is affected by noise. The first terminal determines the appropriate control parameters in advance and sends them to the second terminal via message, allowing the second terminal to proactively adjust its settings rather than reactively increasing volume during noise events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from volume level to interference control parameters that include play mode, volume level, and pause state. By transmitting these comprehensive parameters through a message, the system enables the second terminal to adjust multiple settings optimally rather than simply increasing volume, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining noise resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If automatic volume adjustment method is used, then noise resistance is improved, but terminal lifespan is reduced due to frequent volume adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise interferenceVSAvoidterminal lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of interference control parameters and transmits them via message before noise interference occurs. This allows the second terminal to pre-adjust its audio output settings, avoiding the need for frequent reactive volume adjustments that would stress the terminal hardware and reduce lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the first terminal monitors the audio service execution state and surrounding noise conditions, then sends interference control parameters to the second terminal. This closed-loop feedback enables optimized, condition-based adjustments rather than frequent unconditional volume increases, reducing wear on the terminal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3386124B1Audio service interference control method and terminal
Publication Date: 2020.05.13 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • EP3386124B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3386124B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3386124B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

The present invention provides a method for controlling interference in an audio service and a terminal. The method includes: when executing an audio service, sending, by a first terminal, a first message by using a short-range wireless communications technology; determining, by a second terminal according to the first message, whether the second terminal supports interference control; and adjusting, by the second terminal, a setting of the second terminal according to the interference control parameter if the second terminal supports the interference control, and the second terminal falls within a controlled range. It can be learned that in a process in which the first terminal performs interference control on the second terminal, the first terminal may send the first message to the second terminal without a need of a noise reduction device, so that the second terminal adjusts the setting of the second terminal. This can be implemented easily without complex operations at low costs.