Audio Track Editing via Inverse Effect Application

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In digital audio editing, it is challenging to enhance specific audio tracks while minimizing interference from competing tracks that share similar frequency ranges, leading to masked audio data.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves selecting specific audio tracks for editing and applying an inverse audio effect to non-selected tracks, which includes amplitude or spectral print adjustments to emphasize the selected track by attenuating corresponding frequencies in other tracks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If amplitude increase is applied to a selected audio track to enhance it, then the selected track becomes more prominent, but the overall audio balance deteriorates and other tracks become overly suppressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplitude of selected trackVSAvoidaudio balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different amplitude adjustments to different tracks based on their frequency content. Instead of uniformly increasing the amplitude of the selected track across all frequencies, the system selectively boosts only the frequency ranges where the selected track has significant energy, while applying minimal or no suppression to other tracks in non-overlapping frequency ranges. This localized approach maintains natural audio balance while achieving prominence for the selected track.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by not directly boosting the selected track's amplitude, but rather by selectively suppressing only the specific frequency ranges in other tracks that compete with the selected track. This inverse approach achieves the same effect of making the selected track more prominent while avoiding the harmful side effect of overall audio balance deterioration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Illumination intensity

If amplitude increase is applied to a selected audio track, then the selected track stands out more, but distortion and loss of audio quality occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplitude of selected trackVSAvoidaudio quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies amplitude boosting only to specific frequency ranges where the selected track has significant content, rather than uniformly across the entire frequency spectrum. This selective local enhancement avoids introducing distortion in frequency ranges where the selected track does not have significant energy, thereby maintaining audio quality while achieving the desired prominence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by boosting only the necessary frequency ranges to achieve prominence, rather than applying excessive amplitude increase across all frequencies. This partial approach achieves the minimum necessary enhancement to make the selected track stand out while avoiding the harmful effects of excessive amplitude boosting that cause distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Illumination intensity

If amplitude increase is applied to a selected audio track, then the track becomes more prominent, but the complexity of the editing process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplitude of selected trackVSAvoidediting process
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by automatically analyzing the frequency content of the selected track and autonomously determining which frequency ranges require boosting and which other tracks require suppression. The system performs these complex analytical and adjustment operations without requiring manual intervention from the user, thereby achieving prominent enhancement of the selected track while keeping the editing process simple and automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent automatically changes multiple audio parameters (amplitude, frequency ranges, suppression levels) based on the spectral analysis of the selected track. This automated parameter adjustment eliminates the need for manual tuning of multiple parameters by the user, reducing editing complexity while achieving optimal prominence for the selected track.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Illumination intensity

If amplitude increase is applied to a selected audio track, then the track becomes more prominent, but more time is required to achieve satisfactory results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplitude of selected trackVSAvoidediting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary spectral analysis of the selected track before applying any amplitude adjustments. By pre-identifying the frequency ranges where the selected track has significant energy and pre-determining which other tracks need suppression in those ranges, the system eliminates the need for iterative manual adjustments and listening tests, thereby achieving prominent enhancement quickly and efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses spectral analysis feedback to automatically determine the appropriate amplitude adjustments and suppression levels. The system continuously monitors the frequency content and adjusts parameters based on this feedback, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error adjustments and reducing the time required to achieve satisfactory results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9191134B2Editing audio assets
Publication Date: 2015.11.17 ADOBE INC
  • US9191134B2 patent drawing
  • US9191134B2 patent drawing
  • US9191134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer program products for editing digital audio data are provided. In some implementations a method is provided. The method includes receiving digital audio data incorporated in a plurality of audio tracks and receiving a selection of one or more audio tracks of the plurality of audio tracks for editing, the selected audio tracks being fewer than all of the plurality of audio tracks. The method also includes receiving an input specifying an audio effect to apply to the selected audio tracks and applying an inverse of the audio effect to one or more non-selected audio tracks in response to the input.